Dont have the tweet handy, but @brucefeldmancfb is saying there may be a Pac12/Big12 merger into a 20 team super league.
The B1G better get busy or they are going to miss the boat.
And no to KU and ISU. That goes against everything they said when they invited Maryland and Rutgers.
But the pickings are slim right now.
Everything else aside, from a rivalry standpoint, I would't mind bringing KU and ISU into the Big Ten.
Dont have the tweet handy, but @brucefeldmancfb is saying there may be a Pac12/Big12 merger into a 20 team super league.
The B1G better get busy or they are going to miss the boat.
And no to KU and ISU. That goes against everything they said when they invited Maryland and Rutgers.
But the pickings are slim right now.
.........and others are singing that song.OMFG...I hope there is no way this is true. Not sure who this guy is, but apparently he was correct in saying Leipold was going to be the next Kansas coach after Miles was fired.
Mike Vernon
@M_Vernon
There is a sense that Iowa State is involved with the Big Ten as well. KU has the head start here and would be trying to bring ISU along, if anything.
Mike Vernon
@M_Vernon
KU REALIGNMENT HEARINGS: KU has a call set up with the Big Ten.
Campbell leaves. They will return to a 4-8 win teamUmm per their records, ISU has done pretty well. Not every year.
As a fan it wouldn't bother me if Iowa State was in the Big Ten but it makes no sense to add them. They offer zero revenue to the BTN, adding them would mean smaller shares for the rest of the schools. They are fine academically but I don't think they are a match for the BTAA
I agree, it would be ok with me but I can't see the Big Ten being ok with it. For Iowa it makes ooc scheduling easier because ISU would now be a conference game every year. IOWA could even play ISU on Black Friday every year while Neb plays Kansas.
Iowa/ISU and Kansas/Nebraska on Black Friday actually has an appeal.I agree, it would be ok with me but I can't see the Big Ten being ok with it. For Iowa it makes ooc scheduling easier because ISU would now be a conference game every year. IOWA could even play ISU on Black Friday every year while Neb plays Kansas.
B10 would geologically b the most natural fit however I don’t think it would b good for the Hawks. There are only 3 states in the B10 that have 2 B10 schools in them. Michigan, Indiana, & Illinois. Indiana’s population is 6.7 million. Michigan is 9.9 million. Illinois is 12.6 million. Iowa’s population..............a mire 3.1 million. I don’t think having both schools in the same conference would b a good thing.
As a fan it wouldn't bother me if Iowa State was in the Big Ten but it makes no sense to add them. They offer zero revenue to the BTN, adding them would mean smaller shares for the rest of the schools. They are fine academically but I don't think they are a match for the BTAA.
Kansas, however, is a perfect match. You add in their geography footprint and I would think they pay for themselves adding the Kansas City and Wichita markets. But Kansas is also well known for their cancer research so they would be a great fit on the academic side with the Big Ten cancer research consortium.
I would think if the Big Ten is looking to add they'd add a member on the eastern side along with one on the western side. Virginia?
Can’t. Notre Dame is bound to the ACC if they decide to join a conference.