deanvogs
Well-Known Member
This is just a stupid example. Doesn't mean that it is meaningless.
The whole backstory to this discussion is 56 tried to use Just the PER stat to say player X was better than player Y. You admitted above that you need more than that. I am trolling 56 calling it a junk stat, but at the same time I am serious when I say that PER by itself does NOT tell you one player is better than another like 56 contends it does.
PER in and of itself is fine to look at in conjunction with the other stats. It isn't not an all defining stat that conclusively tell you that play x is better than player y.