SixAMtailgate
Well-Known Member
Hate to ever say that matt perault was right about anything but ......
Gabbert > Foles
Gabbert > Foles
Hate to ever say that matt perault was right about anything but ......
Gabbert > Foles
I told Matt last night that I was wrong. I pretty much beat anyone to the punch; I never have a problem admitting when I am wrong about something and dont wait for others to bring it up![]()
I thought Gabbert was the best QB Iowa has played this season, including Persa. Gabbert dominated the entire game but did make one of the biggest mistakes I've seen a QB make to completely turn a game around.
I thought Gabbert was the best QB Iowa has played this season, including Persa. Gabbert dominated the entire game but did make one of the biggest mistakes I've seen a QB make to completely turn a game around.
IMO I'd still give the edge to persa, he's such a dynamic dual threat QB. If gabbert had any wheels then it would be a different story.
i would say foles>gabbert for the simple fact that foles won and gabbert did not.
isn't that the same argument many of you made against ricky? he wasn't winning games this year? can't be the best if you don't win, right?
I told Matt last night that I was wrong. I pretty much beat anyone to the punch; I never have a problem admitting when I am wrong about something and dont wait for others to bring it up![]()
He actually made TWO huge mistakes, but that's the breaks. Can't do that as a QB.
Thread finished . . . next. . .
Persa is not better than Gabbert. C'mon.
Gotta go with Persa. The blitz was effective in slowing down Gabbert. Whenever we blitzed Persa we got scortched. And both of them took what we'd give if we didn't blitz. We had no answer against Persa though, and he didn't make one of the most boneheaded plays I've ever seen.
Persa>Gabbert.