JonDMiller
Publisher/Founder
Then start talking about lack of talent and stop talking about how we're young.
When you are lacking in talent, you wind up playing younger players. Am I missing something here, or am I being put on?
Then start talking about lack of talent and stop talking about how we're young.
When you are lacking in talent, you wind up playing younger players. Am I missing something here, or am I being put on?
What is this an Abbott and Costello routine?
My point all along has been that yes we are lacking in talent - we agree on that.
It's your youth argument where we diverge.
Our biggest problems are ball throwers and ball catchers. That is NOT a young group. However, it is the group where we are the LEAST talented.
Our being forced to play young players, is an issue, but it is NOT why we lost against Iowa State and NOT why we should have lost to Northern Illinois.
So Ferentz is going full metal Lickliter, trying to win B1G games with MAC talent. That's awesome.
Check this out: At the skill positions, we were better in 1999 than we are now. Better receivers, better running backs. QB prolly a wash. But that team beat NIU by more than this team did. So there's that.
This is absolutely unforgivable. I'm ready for the post-Ferentz era if this is how it's gonna be.
Also, anyone waiting for Vandensherman to improve, I've got bad news for ya. Dude's a fifth year senior and he's not only not breaking bad habits, he's doubling down on them. That last interception? That's a pass made by a rookie on his first play from scrimmage, not by a fifth year senior. That's a benchable offense.
Now I know this is just a stupid game and nothing but entertainment when you strip away the veneer, but let's face it...we're all invested in this for various reasons. via our time and money. As such, we should ask ourselves if this return on our investment is acceptable.
One final thought. Although I admire Ferentz from a personal standpoint, and I want him to succeed, I've been suspicious of his decision-making ever since that awful day at Kinnick when he pulled Brad Banks in the Michigan game, and my doubts have never really been allayed. Now, it seems, they are being confirmed.
I don't think youth or talent is the problem, but the coaching staff. ferentz moved an experienced offensive line coach to the defensive line where he had zero experience, and hired an offensive line coach with zero offensive line coaching experience. I don't think Iowa will be very good since Norm Parker retired. Norm was a great defensive minded coach. Iowa has always been weak offensively under ferentz, but with Parker the defense was pretty good. Great coaches like Parker don't come around very often. Look at all the problems some of the power teams have when they lose their coaches, and Iowa will never be able to recruit the same as a lot of the elite teams in football unless they cheat.
We will get beat over the top in many games to come when we play against more accurate QBs that can make completions for more than 15 yards. If Jantz was more accurate we would have been burned for huge TD's last week. I remember them trying twice in a row (I believe) to burn us over the top and Jantz had him open both times but just over threw him. If he got him in stride it was going to the house.
So Ferentz is going full metal Lickliter, trying to win B1G games with MAC talent. That's awesome.
Check this out: At the skill positions, we were better in 1999 than we are now. Better receivers, better running backs. QB prolly a wash. But that team beat NIU by more than this team did. So there's that.
This is absolutely unforgivable. I'm ready for the post-Ferentz era if this is how it's gonna be.
Also, anyone waiting for Vandensherman to improve, I've got bad news for ya. Dude's a fifth year senior and he's not only not breaking bad habits, he's doubling down on them. That last interception? That's a pass made by a rookie on his first play from scrimmage, not by a fifth year senior. That's a benchable offense.
Now I know this is just a stupid game and nothing but entertainment when you strip away the veneer, but let's face it...we're all invested in this for various reasons. via our time and money. As such, we should ask ourselves if this return on our investment is acceptable.
One final thought. Although I admire Ferentz from a personal standpoint, and I want him to succeed, I've been suspicious of his decision-making ever since that awful day at Kinnick when he pulled Brad Banks in the Michigan game, and my doubts have never really been allayed. Now, it seems, they are being confirmed.
At the risk of sounding like an "apologist", I really don't think the problem was youth, talent, or coaching on Saturday. It was the ability to catch the freakin' football. I just got done re-watching the game, and it was abysmal. The D played great, outside of the first drive, and JVB's stat line looks much better if balls that hit guys in the hands just get caught. If the offense was just average we would be 2-0, and I'd be very confident about 8 to 9 wins this season. As is, if we don't start executing on offense, we might struggle to make a bowl.
No excuse for two weeks in a row of having first and goal inside the 5 and not punching it in.
Inability to catch the ball.. Isn't that a "talent" issue? WR's should be able to catch. If they can't, then I guess they aren't very good options to throw the ball to?
No, I don't think blatant drops have anything to do with talent. It shows lack of focus and execution. Example: CJF had two or three balls hit him right in the hands that would have really changed the complexion of drives, but he dropped them...I don't think anyone would say that he lacks talent.
You could probably argue that either way, but my main point was just that if you catch the simple balls, you probably win last Saturday.
This is something I wrote back in December of 2011.
The 2008 Iowa recruiting class was ranked 9th in the Big Ten by Scout.com and 13 of the 25 signees are no longer with the program. Those Class of 2008 players would be the seniors on the 2012 team. Guys like James Ferentz and James Vandenberg were a part of that class and more than 50% of their ‘signing classmates’ are gone.
The 2009 Iowa recruiting class ranked 11th in the Big Ten (out of 12, as I am factoring in Nebraska’s national class rankings into the Big Ten now). That class had 18 members on signing day and eight of them are no longer in the program.
Having that level of attrition in back to back classes which would now be your fifth year seniors and fourth year juniors is devastating to a developmental program like Iowa’s.
The 2010 class was ranked 6th in the Big Ten and signed 21 members; 18 of them are still at Iowa. The 25 member 2011 class was ranked 4th in the Big Ten and is down five members from signing day, but many of these players saw action this season.
The 2010 and 2011 classes have a lot of speed and talent but 2013 season is a better target for that talent to show up in big numbers on the field.
***Coker and McCall were still with the team when I wrote this, so they go against 2010 and 2011 class attrition.
Fast forward to now...the fewest number of senior starters for a Kirk Ferentz team at Iowa. 25 of 47 of the opening game two-deep roster were sophomores or younger.
The 2008 & 2009 recruiting classes were just not good classes. Those classes came on the heels of Iowa's 6-7 2006 team and 6-6 2007 team, which may have factored in to getting the attention of the right kids. (Yeah, I know, may not bode well for classes after this year's). DL attrition is also hurting.
Iowa has made changes on the recruiting front that will help, namely Brian Ferentz and LeVar Woods.