tm3308
Well-Known Member
I'd have to go with Tate on offense. I think he could excel in a Greg Davis offense, and he had the right kind of moxie for a team like this. He seemed to thrive on the odds being stacked against him.
Defensively, you have to go with Roth, King or Sanders. You can argue all you want about whether we need a presence in the secondary to help cover for the lack of pass rush, or vice versa. But you have to have one of those guys. Looking back on the Ferentz era, those are the three guys who either defined or personified the attitude of Iowa football. Personally, I'd lean towards King or Sanders, and I'd probably pick #33. If there was one player who set the tone for Ferentz's first run of success, it was Sanders.
Defensively, you have to go with Roth, King or Sanders. You can argue all you want about whether we need a presence in the secondary to help cover for the lack of pass rush, or vice versa. But you have to have one of those guys. Looking back on the Ferentz era, those are the three guys who either defined or personified the attitude of Iowa football. Personally, I'd lean towards King or Sanders, and I'd probably pick #33. If there was one player who set the tone for Ferentz's first run of success, it was Sanders.