trj
Well-Known Member
This is a hilarious thread. So many football geniuses on this board.
The main difference between Iowa's football program and perennial B1G West rep Wisky's football program is defense. Wisky perennially has a dominant defense and Iowa does not. The goal of Wisky's defense is to get off the field and the goal of Iowa's defense is to bend but not break and stay on the field for great stretches of the game.
Iowa's offense, even during the Greg Davis years, was much more potent than Wisky's offense is. Wisky and Iowa run the same type of run-first offense although Wisky showcases their player's athleticism on offense and defense more so than Iowa.
Wisky and Iowa recruit the same type of athletic players.
The difference is the defense. Not the offense.
Iowa runs a zone blocking scheme which depends on angles and reaching levels. That takes cohesion and execution. Injuries on the O-line throws everything off for the Iowa offense. Wisconsin runs a power run scheme, hat on hat, straight up maul the dude straight across from you. It is easier to recruit and develop o-lineman in Iowa's scheme. But a power blocking scheme is less complex. It is easier on the QB when things aren't perfect.
As for the defense, it is a double edge sword, bend don't break allows Iowa to compete with superior opponents and it gives opponents equal to or inferior a better shot at competing and/or winning more than they probably should.