GiganticMeat
Well-Known Member
Back to .500 we go. Yepee doo...
Not one person said we'd be winning if we'd rebounded better. Sportstalent just said it wouldn't be this bad. And you disagreed. You take away all the second chance points, and this game is not THIS bad.
Seriously, how is this concept difficult to grasp?
I am excited about Josh O's future as well, but we are going to have a very hard time replacing Gatens. Arguably our best offensive player and easily our best defender. Not to mention the leadership and clutch shots he has hit. We will miss Gatens a ton.
Starting to think those wins over Wisconsin and Michigan were flukes. Good teams don't win those kind of games and lose to Campbell, Nebraska and OSU/MSU/IU by 20-30 points in the same season.
You really have a problem with me saying it still would be bad. Seriously it's not not hard for me to grasp that concept TM. I think we are watching the same game..
Good job Archie...about 30 mins too late. We needed to hammer Zeller and the rest of the guys driving to the hoop that hard at the beginning of the game.
52 this halfOn a positive note,we scored over 80 points.
Let start Marble, Gatens, and Oglesby for awhile. JO is a better defender than BC anyways.
Back to .500 we go. Yepee doo...
I will never understand why losers feel the need to get cheap like this...
I will never understand why losers feel the need to get cheap like this...
89 points for the game and 51 for the half, not bad for a lousy team, i guess