The WNBA commissioner needs to evaluate how the games are refereed. There are too many inconsistencies in what is a foul and one that is not. It seems to me that the games are called to slow the pace of the games in order to protect the older women. The Thomas woman really was allowed to push her defender off.
On Monday against the Suns, the Fever's fast pace began to show what they need to do to win. The Mitchell woman for the fever was a big factor in taking pressure off of Clark.
You’re making it out to be way more complicated than it really is.
The reality is that no matter how much training and instruction you give, you are dealing with the bottom of the barrel of the profession. It’s like the bottom 2% of people who barely make it through med school and pass boards. Are they doctors? Technically yes. But they still suck and get weeded out and relegated to lower level jobs (hopefully).
Think about how many NBA, G-league, NBA 2K League, ABA, Men’s D-1, and Women’s D-1 basketball referees there are. Thousands of them. Welp, the WNBA gets the flunkie leftovers after all the rest of those leagues plus others are done having their pick.
The reason you have shitty officiating and coaching is because you are getting the bottom of the barrel hires at those position, because there’s no pay and no demand. There’s no pay and no demand because women’s pro basketball is a subpar, boring, sloppy product. Show me some evidence otherwise. If it weren’t, wouldn’t there be fans actually going to games or watching on tv? Wouldn’t WNBA actually be televised if it was fun to watch? Don’t take my word for it, attendance and viewership speaks for itself. Let’s not kid ourselves, it isn’t going to take too many more 10-15 point games from CC and the Fever going 2-37 to stop the sellout crowds and put Indiana back at a couple thousand fans with tickets they literally have to give away.
Honestly, what the heck to people expect?