Just because the university decided to pay her 'not-for-cause termination' stipulation doesn't mean the university gets off free of any repercussions. In fact, if she can prove that there is a double-standard being applied to her that wasn't applied to her male counterpart then she can file a wrongful termination suit. And to be honest, I think she has a pretty strong case.
PS, if a couple football players complained to Barta right after Iowa won the Orange Bowl and said that KF was mean to them and he straight up cancelled KF's contract and told him to hit the bricks then I would absolutely 'get on my high horse' about that. The fact of the matter is KF doesn't have the on the field success that Greisbaum did and he had more controversy (see Rhabdo) and he's still got a job.
The whole precedent thing is just tough... How does one definitively do that? Comparing football coaches to womens field hockey is not even close to the same. The culture of dealing with 100 something male football players is just going to be a ton different then 20 or so (i'm not sure how many are on it)field hockey females of the same age. And that's not even bringing into account the money factor which I'm sure is the end all be all. I'm not saying that should or shouldn't be. Just stating the obvious.
The way I see it is once she and her relationship with her superior (albeit not her direct superior but she was above her in athletic department) was outed (they were less then truthful about it as far as disclosing it from the git go) she seemed to think she was or should have been untouchable. Well that shouldn't have a darn thing to do with weather you can have a job or lose it. So many gays seem to think they can use that as a tool to make themselves untouchable. Employers are scared to hire them but even more scared not to. Then they are that much more scared to fire them if they need to cause they know they'll march right down to get a lawyer and bring up a discrimination suit they'll end up having to settle on...
My prediction is Barta is (at least he should be) looking for a soft landing somewhere else now. So if he can get someone else to hire him he's gone. And if he's still here long enough for the new president whomever that ends up being hired is to fire him then I think that'll happen within 6 months of that. I don't think he'll be around for this deal to get resolved as these usually take forever...