HawkeyeBasket
Well-Known Member
TWO references to scholarly articles in one thread? This is amazing.
It's not really about color, but rather ancestry.
I really enjoy track and field, and I think the Western African dominance of the 100m race is fascinating. Of the top 100 fastest men of all time, about 95 of them are descended from a very narrow region of the world. That is an interesting phenomenon, physiologically and sociologically. As our knowledge of genetics grows, some interesting discoveries are being made that help us to understand not just why people descended from this part of the world are fast, but also why anyone becomes fast (see Importance of mitochondrial haplotypes and maternal lineage in sprint performance among individuals of West African ancestry, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Apr 2012). Also, it is just interesting when someone not from that area breaks into the club. If you don't think seeing a Caucasian in a sprint final is unusual, you have not been watching much track.
Likewise with distance running. For the past 50 years, middle-distance and long-distance events have been dominated by Kenyans and Ethiopians. There have been numerous studies to determine why this is the case, summarized in a recent review article in the Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (Kenyan and Ethiopian Distance Runners: What Makes Them so Good?, 7(2); 92-102). Furthermore, almost all of the great runners come a small number of tribes out of the many different tribes in these countries. That is also fascinating.
I teach physiology of exercise, so I guess maybe these things are more interesting to me than to others.
Thanks for the very informative post.
I've been amazed with the same things. The W. African sprinters and the E. African (Kenyan, Ethiopian, etc) distance runners are something to behold.
It is truly amazing that some of these runners come from just a few tribes. Mind blowing, really, considering the number of people on this planet.
This seems like a strange topic--certainly cannot argue the fact that the Jamaicans seem to do very well in sprints, east Africans longer distances, etc.
That said, don't forget Kevin Little from the D.M. area. Iowan, and world t & f champ in 200m. also performed well in 100m. He made pretty good $ i'm guessing on the european circuit.
Kevin Little - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It's not really about color, but rather ancestry.
I really enjoy track and field, and I think the Western African dominance of the 100m race is fascinating. Of the top 100 fastest men of all time, about 95 of them are descended from a very narrow region of the world. That is an interesting phenomenon, physiologically and sociologically. As our knowledge of genetics grows, some interesting discoveries are being made that help us to understand not just why people descended from this part of the world are fast, but also why anyone becomes fast (see Importance of mitochondrial haplotypes and maternal lineage in sprint performance among individuals of West African ancestry, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Apr 2012). Also, it is just interesting when someone not from that area breaks into the club. If you don't think seeing a Caucasian in a sprint final is unusual, you have not been watching much track.
Likewise with distance running. For the past 50 years, middle-distance and long-distance events have been dominated by Kenyans and Ethiopians. There have been numerous studies to determine why this is the case, summarized in a recent review article in the Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (Kenyan and Ethiopian Distance Runners: What Makes Them so Good?, 7(2); 92-102). Furthermore, almost all of the great runners come a small number of tribes out of the many different tribes in these countries. That is also fascinating.
I teach physiology of exercise, so I guess maybe these things are more interesting to me than to others.
I thought it was this dude.
I thought the OP was Fattest White guy ever -- I was expecting a whole different thread and thought it was in honor of the old state fair kicking off today because I bet he is there.
It's weird how some people see color so much. He's just another runner, an extremely fast one
Good discussion. As a therapist I've always been curious about it, but haven't taken the time to actually see if there was anything in the journals about it.
Really ends up being a nature/nurture argument I think. While I lean heavily towards the nature side, there are strong arguments for environmental and societal factors.
Actually, Jon Entine tackled the subject matter several years ago in his book "Taboo" it gets a little bogged down with the genetics discussion and the societal/environmental factors get left out, but it is a good read.
I agree. I cringed when Bob Costas commented that Gabby was the first black female to win the all around. Why can't it be that she is just a female?It's weird how some people see color so much. He's just another runner, an extremely fast one
I agree. I cringed when Bob Costas commented that Gabby was the first black female to win the all around. Why can't it be that she is just a female?
Yeah I saw the race last night. It's hard to focus on anyone else when Bolt runs like that. But that guy can fly!