hawkdrummer1
Well-Known Member
Clones: this one time... this one guy (they're still talking about Seneca Wallace)
Hawks: body of work over an extended period
Game.
Hawks: body of work over an extended period
Game.
What a fail of a post by TM.
Good luck getting him to admit he's wrong.
Why do sportswriters all want to make the same lazy arguments? Just bend the facts to fit your narrative. What other program in the country would use games from four years ago as an argument that they are improving? Their huge win over Nebraska was followed by three straight losing seasons, yeah really a sign of improvement.
Iowa has zero division titles. ISU tied for a share of the 2004 Big 12 North Division title, by going 4-4 in conference, tying them with 4-4 Colorado. Colorado won the tie-breaker, I'm guessing, due to their head to head win, and played in the Big 12 title game.
Pretty sure that isu doesn't get to pick the start time of their games. And I guess I have always found it weird that you wouldn't treat every game as your superbowl since they all count the same. To me that would be bad coaching, and horrible to game prep to not have your team excited to play every game, and playing as hard as they possibly can. Especially early in the year when you still have everything to play for. Also.. they are kind of bad a** uniforms
Could you inform us of the last time the Clowns had 2 winning records in a row. It's probably hard enough to name one winning season in a row.Seems you Hawkeye fans forget your on downward spiral. Im aware you don't know a thing about momentum while you riding a six game losing streak and declined in wins every year since 09
With Iowa's relevancy declining and ISU's climbing from Ames to as far away as Nevada.Lol The same old tired arguments from HN. That's great your team used to do nice things and win and whatnot, but iowa's relevancy is quickly declining. Well, from the national perspective anyway. Hawk fans may very well be turning into kNU fans, just without the NC's.
But you're not a Clown fan right. Nebraska?Seems I struck a nerve. Its so easy picking on Hawkeye fans. You guys are already looking forward to next year and your easy schedule where you might have a snowballs chance in hell to compete in the legends division. You guys bring our division down.
But, every college team looking for a coach wants Rhoads. With his record I don't blame them.That is his biggest flaw, he's inconsistent. Now Roads, there's a guy who's consistent, 3 B12 wins a year. You play 8 conference games, he'll win ya 3. You play 9 conference games, he'll win ya 3. Something to be said for consistent performance like that.
Over all records don't mean anything. Not only did they beat Nebraska 4 years ago and Oklahoma State 2 years ago, but they almost beat Kansas State last year! And KSU's women's basketball team didn't even have a plane crash the day before! That is marked and noticeable improvement that demonstrates Rhoades and Pollard have a plan and executing it to perfection.Could you inform us of the last time the Clowns had 2 winning records in a row. It's probably hard enough to name one winning season in a row.
Why do sportswriters all want to make the same lazy arguments? Just bend the facts to fit your narrative. What other program in the country would use games from four years ago as an argument that they are improving? Their huge win over Nebraska was followed by three straight losing seasons, yeah really a sign of improvement.
Yeah, wins over Nebraska and Okie State don't serve as any kind of evidence for improvement.
So one losing season in 6 years shows that Iowa is really bad now but 5 losing seasons in 6 years means that ISU is on the rise and are the superior program. ISU has 3 losing seasons under Rhoads in 4 years. Iowa has had 4 losing seasons under Ferentz in 14 years and that's including the first two when he basically stated from scratch.
Iowa has more wins the last four years than ISU.
ISU has four straight losing conference records under Rhoads. Iowa only has one losing conference record the last four years.
Iowa has had better recruiting classes the last four years according to rivals. So who has the better program?
So one losing season in 6 years shows that Iowa is really bad now but 5 losing seasons in 6 years means that ISU is on the rise and are the superior program. ISU has 3 losing seasons under Rhoads in 4 years. Iowa has had 4 losing seasons under Ferentz in 14 years and that's including the first two when he basically stated from scratch.
If you look at the teams since Rhoads started.
Iowa has more wins the last four years than ISU.
ISU has four straight losing conference records under Rhoads. Iowa only has one losing conference record the last four years.
Iowa has had better recruiting classes the last four years according to rivals. So who has the better program?
So one losing season in 6 years shows that Iowa is really bad now but 5 losing seasons in 6 years means that ISU is on the rise and are the superior program. ISU has 3 losing seasons under Rhoads in 4 years. Iowa has had 4 losing seasons under Ferentz in 14 years and that's including the first two when he basically stated from scratch.
If you look at the teams since Rhoads started.
Iowa has more wins the last four years than ISU.
ISU has four straight losing conference records under Rhoads. Iowa only has one losing conference record the last four years.
Iowa has had better recruiting classes the last four years according to rivals. So who has the better program?