Hawkeye11en1
Well-Known Member
How in the hell do you guys keep falling for this?
+7839428345728934529837592834
How in the hell do you guys keep falling for this?
Rose Bowls, Chad. Rose Bowls. Count 'em up.
Oh yeah, sure it was. Under the old regime, that would have been OSU's game. Same with 2009. It's been over 20 years bince we played in the Rose Bowl. I know you guys will all make excuses for Kurt and blame the BCS, but he is no Hayden. I get that you're all happy with Outback and Insight Bowls and such, but I just want to see the team go to Pasadena once more in my lifetime and if we need to go a different direction with coaching for that to happen, then let's do it. Norm hasn't taken a team there bince the '80's with MSU and that is the weak link.
Bince our last Rose Bowl, even allegedly inferior teams like Purdue, Illinois and Northwestern have been to Pasadena. Wisconsin's been to something like 4. Face facts guys, once Wisconsin brought in Alvarez, they took our spot in the upper echelon of the B10. Heck, with the OSU improprieties, MSU should have gone last year bince they could actually beat Wisconsin. Now, in a regime where Iowa will have to win its division and then the conference title game, I'll be stunned if we get to one Rose Bowl in the next 30 years.
Im sorry but you are simply delusional.
Illinois went to the rose bowl as a 9-3 team and you are saying that is a better season than Iowas 10-2? How on gods green earth can you possibly make an argument for that?
Had OSU not gone to the BCS title game Illinois is in the cap one, it was a fluke that will never be allowed again, Illinois did not earn a rose bowl period.
Your probably one of those guys who would rather go to the rose bowl than the BCS title game arent you?
New flash this isn't the 80s anymore. Things have changed and are continuing to, the bowl system isn't even going to be around that much longer.
You're actually wrong about the 02 season. And bince you are going by the old rules Iowa would have gone to the game bince our last trip was in 91 and OSU had been there in 97.
Guys, please stop responding to me. I am remembering why I bought Northwestern tickets. They aren't charging me Cadillac prices for a Chevy Cavalier. I never bought a Cadillac Cimmaron. They are charging me Hyundai prices for Honda quality.
Asking for a guy who pulls north of $3 mil a year for just a single Rose Bowl or win in C-bus must mean I'm setting my expectations too high.
Please, pretty please, go be a NW fan. I beg you.
What is NW? Northwestern University is "NU."
I get it that you guys don't expect excellence, but I will keep working on you and you'll come around.
It will never be a good conversation with of4pee involved. Why Jon doesn't just ban this thread-hijacking smartazs is beyond me.
It's not humor. It's annoying and disruptive.
Your potty mouth should get you banned. I didn't hijack this thread, Vintage did.
No, I don't think so. YOU were the one bringing in your ridiculous Rose Bowl argument to combat Vintage's comment. And just about any Iowa fan would hardly disagree with a disparaging remark about anything Illinois-related, which means that had YOU not taken the thread in this direction, things would have continued to move along smoothly.
Hawk fans citing the Orange Bowl win as some surrogate for going to the Rose Bowl is as pathetic as clown fan bragging about that period where they won like 4 out of 6 and acting like ISU was better than Iowa because of it. Sorry, but until Kurt gets to a Rose Bowl, he will be an inferior coach to Rod Zook.
Oh, so now talking about Iowa's lack of Rose Bowl appearances is ridiculous? Son, you were either in gestation or diapers the last time the Hawks played in the Rose Bowl, so don't tell me that asking for one, just one Rose Bowl once every fifteen years is ridiculous.
Guys, leave him alone. I hate to argue, but he may be right. We just need to find out who this Kurt guy is. Maybe we should bag on him.
Talking about how Illinois' Rose Bowl appearance (and their utter futility in said appearance) is superior to Iowa's Orange Bowl appearance (and their sheer domination in said appearance) is what makes your argument completely ridiculous.