deanvogs
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure. The whole thread was about trolling me.....then I bounce on him, and you showed up. So you just might be getting my sloppy seconds here PC.....
Charlie Moore scores 38
- Thread starter Duke
- Start date
I'm not sure. The whole thread was about trolling me.....then I bounce on him, and you showed up. So you just might be getting my sloppy seconds here PC.....
I'm not sure. The whole thread was about trolling me.....then I bounce on him, and you showed up. So you just might be getting my sloppy seconds here PC.....
I feel so violated.
So why didn't he recruit a better PG to replace him since he couldn't develop Mike?
He wasn't even the least talented player in the starting lineup. Why hasn't he found someone better than Jok? Why hasn't he found someone better than Baer? Why hasn't he found someone better than Cook? You can (and should) always want someone better at every position.
Cook Baer and Jok are our three best players this year
Is 3 the cutoff?
No
So what is the cutoff in your mind? You say the top 3 players on the team don't need recruited over and 3 is not the cutoff. That means at least the top 4 players don't need to be recruited over. Then you say Gesell needed to be recruited over which means you don't even think he was the 4th best player on the team last year. So how many players on last year's team do you think were better than Gesell?
Are you related to Fran or something? It's obvious he's struggled to recruit the PG position
Saying he's struggled to recruit everywhere else too isn't something a relative would say. I can't believe you don't think Gesell was one of the 4 top players last year.
Gesell was one of our 4 top players last year. Fran has had first team all conference wings and posts but has never recruited a PG that got better than honorable mention all conference
You said Gesell should have been recruited over. So I said Jok, Baer, and Cook should have been recruited over too. Then you said they are our top 3 players. So I said is top 3 players the cut off for not needing recruited over and you said no. That means you don't need to recruit over top 4 at minimum. Now you admit Gesell was top 4. So why again do you think he needed recruited over so bad?
Fran has produced high level talent at the wing and post positions but not at the PG position. Why are we still arguing about this?
Because you just backed yourself in a corner and it's funny .
How so? I said Fran can't recruit the PG position and he can't. I'm not wrong here
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
He got a top 75 PG recruit. He has only gotten two higher ranked recruits in his 6 years, both posts players
He never got a top 75 PG recruit
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Top 80, top 100, whatever. He is the 3rd highest recruit Fran has gotten.
He obviously never lived up to it. I give him more credit for getting White than Gesell
I already pointed it out. You said he should have recruited over Gesell (who was one of the top players on the team) but he shouldn't have recruited over Jok, Baer, and Cook because they were top players on the team. That makes no sense.
