Charlie Moore scores 38

So is this the soft troll I'm seeing now? I can't tell. If it goes by the more dumb he sounds, tho harder he's trolling, I would say he's trolling pretty hard right now.

I'm not sure. The whole thread was about trolling me.....then I bounce on him, and you showed up. So you just might be getting my sloppy seconds here PC.....:)
 
So why didn't he recruit a better PG to replace him since he couldn't develop Mike?

He wasn't even the least talented player in the starting lineup. Why hasn't he found someone better than Jok? Why hasn't he found someone better than Baer? Why hasn't he found someone better than Cook? You can (and should) always want someone better at every position.
 
He wasn't even the least talented player in the starting lineup. Why hasn't he found someone better than Jok? Why hasn't he found someone better than Baer? Why hasn't he found someone better than Cook? You can (and should) always want someone better at every position.

Cook Baer and Jok are our three best players this year
 

So what is the cutoff in your mind? You say the top 3 players on the team don't need recruited over and 3 is not the cutoff. That means at least the top 4 players don't need to be recruited over. Then you say Gesell needed to be recruited over which means you don't even think he was the 4th best player on the team last year. So how many players on last year's team do you think were better than Gesell?
 
So what is the cutoff in your mind? You say the top 3 players on the team don't need recruited over and 3 is not the cutoff. That means at least the top 4 players don't need to be recruited over. Then you say Gesell needed to be recruited over which means you don't even think he was the 4th best player on the team last year. So how many players on last year's team do you think were better than Gesell?

Are you related to Fran or something? It's obvious he's struggled to recruit the PG position
 
Are you related to Fran or something? It's obvious he's struggled to recruit the PG position

Saying he's struggled to recruit everywhere else too isn't something a relative would say. I can't believe you don't think Gesell was one of the 4 top players last year.
 
Saying he's struggled to recruit everywhere else too isn't something a relative would say. I can't believe you don't think Gesell was one of the 4 top players last year.

Gesell was one of our 4 top players last year. Fran has had first team all conference wings and posts but has never recruited a PG that got better than honorable mention all conference
 
Gesell was one of our 4 top players last year. Fran has had first team all conference wings and posts but has never recruited a PG that got better than honorable mention all conference

You said Gesell should have been recruited over. So I said Jok, Baer, and Cook should have been recruited over too. Then you said they are our top 3 players. So I said is top 3 players the cut off for not needing recruited over and you said no. That means you don't need to recruit over top 4 at minimum. Now you admit Gesell was top 4. So why again do you think he needed recruited over so bad?
 
You said Gesell should have been recruited over. So I said Jok, Baer, and Cook should have been recruited over too. Then you said they are our top 3 players. So I said is top 3 players the cut off for not needing recruited over and you said no. That means you don't need to recruit over top 4 at minimum. Now you admit Gesell was top 4. So why again do you think he needed recruited over so bad?

Fran has produced high level talent at the wing and post positions but not at the PG position. Why are we still arguing about this?
 
How so? I said Fran can't recruit the PG position and he can't. I'm not wrong here

I already pointed it out. You said he should have recruited over Gesell (who was one of the top players on the team) but he shouldn't have recruited over Jok, Baer, and Cook because they were top players on the team. That makes no sense.
 
Top