HawkeyeHypnosis
Well-Known Member
Just the fact you post your garbage in this thread and not even acknowledge the Freshman of the week and Bohannon on historic pace threads is proof to the pudding that your a troll.
Bohannon crow anyone?
- Thread starter DP5555
- Start date
Just the fact you post your garbage in this thread and not even acknowledge the Freshman of the week and Bohannon on historic pace threads is proof to the pudding that your a troll.
No need to have 3 threads arguing the same thing
theboat
Well-Known Member
Yes, because fortunately not all of us are stuck in August like you. You think Hillary is gonna win?
judzeehawk
Well-Known Member
Pretty hard to argue that JBO wasn't freshman of the week!
HawkeyeHypnosis
Well-Known Member
No you just can't give credit where it's due since it doesn't fit your ridiculous argument.
Do you know what upside is? Honest question
I think how you pick and chose to use the statistics to fit your narrative and completely ignore them or other statistics in other cases is the joke.
Bohannon padded his stats against two bad teams. Congrats to him
deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Sure you do. You say Jordan sucks because he is 10th on the team in eFG% even though he is statistcally tied pretty much with both Pritchard and Moore at 49-50% eFG%.
How does one suck, is a volume scorer and a chucker and the other two are da bomb?
Pritchards Orate is impressive, but Jordan is have as good of a season statistically as he is, and if you are gonna say only the Orate matters, then Jordan is better than Moore, and you would have to agree with that then.
So yeah, you ignore, pick and choose, massage and look at only the stats that are convenient to you at the time.
theboat
Well-Known Member
Like career leader in 3s and assists upside? Or year round tan upside?
Bohannon has better offensively than Moore so far this year but Moore is better overall
So no you don't understand it. That makes sense
Possibly poorly worded, what I was trying to say is the way you use them is a joke. Because it is. But it's all part of your act.
Like you have already been told, you pick and choose some of them that fit your narrative but ignore them when someone else is proving a point. You also ignore other more "traditional" stats that also prove you wrong. The point of the entire thread is that anyone who watches the games and understands basketball can see Jordan has a lot going for him and has been doing well as of late. He has upside and is going to be a great Hawkeye. I'm sorry that bothers you so much.
theboat
Well-Known Member
So you don't think potential to lead a Big10 program in 2 major statistical career categories is upside? What is? Jumping ability?
Upside is the ability to improve. Bohannon has a pretty low ceiling in my opinion, much lower than Pemsl, Moss, Daily, Cook and Kriener in my opinion.
theboat
Well-Known Member
So everyone can get better except JBo. Makes perfect sense
