MoseSchrute
Well-Known Member
^Actually, KF mentioned being more involved in the offensive meeting room than the defensive one.
I didn't have a problem with KoKs offense. Like any OC, he some times mixed plays in a way that raised eyebrows, but he maximized the talent, for the most part. He never grumbled about what personnel Iowa did NOT have. He never blamed players, publicly or during guided tours. And when a play call didn't work, he had enough of the respect of his HC for the HC to take the blame.
Now? KF mentioned not even being in on offensive discussions/sessions during one of last season's pressers. Frankly, that's when I thought GD would be gone. The fact he isn't does more to displease me than with KF than just about anything else.
^Actually, KF mentioned being more involved in the offensive meeting room than the defensive one.
I disagree with the skeptics. This team is looking good this year.
Lomax is looking great against both the run and the pass.
Nate Meier is really looking strong and fast! He is going to have a big year!
All of the linebackers are looking very good. They are stepping up big time.
The DTs are playing well as I expected too.
Boone Myers is stepping up big time at LT.
The running backs are showing great speed burst and vision.
The kicking game looks very solid.
Etc etc
I find it very hard to believe you weren't complaining about KOK because no one has ever been satisfied with the offense under Ferentz. The offenses were not good then and the talent was not being maximized save for the the one year KOK was allowed to run a different offense. 2004.
Everyone complained about KOK, except for the ones who were smart enough to know who is really in charge.
Ill give ive you a hint, it's the guy who's title says he's in charge.
KOK was far more vocally hated than Davis.
^Actually, KF mentioned being more involved in the offensive meeting room than the defensive one.
BCS Title run!
This could be the best and most complete defense of this decade so far. Every position group is experienced in the way the 2009 team was. Special teams also is experienced. That is a winning formula.
Iowa has 4 DBs who have started 1 or more games, 3 LBs, 2 DLs. Such a complete group does not happen often. On special teams 2 experianced punters, 2 kickers, long snapper, kick returner, 2 punt returners. Between the defense and special teams they will be putting the offense in good position. The offense returns 3 OL starters, 1 WR, 3 FBs, experienced tight ends a rb with starts. This is one of the most complete teams in a while.
I think the secondary will be pretty good. King is a stud. Outside of that we are hoping for improvements from Lomax and the combo of Mabin/Fleming/Draper. Mabin was up and down last yr when he was good he was good. When he was bad he was benched... It says something when your a starter at Iowa and your benched during a game if you want to talk about something that doesn't happen often that's it.... And then we are breaking in a new safety with Snyder it sounds like. He's a question mark can't say he'll be good or bad yet.
As far as punters go..... Unless Koehn gets the gig there's no reason to not expect more of the same from the other two... 36-38 yard punts and that just sucks unless your punting from midfield all the time. Those two aren't going to magically improve that much. Punting isn't a position that does that usually. Koehn should be rock solid at kicking this year and I have a feeling he'll be doing it all and punting too.
As far as O goes I think the skill positions will be better then last year almost across the board. However the Oline that didn't play well last year overall lost the two best players that were on it for kids who've hardly ever played.... So CJB and that O will only do as well as that line allows them to be.
I know your the eternal optimist Hawknik but returning starters can be a really skewed thing to look at. Look at it this way. Those returning starters are those that were playing for a mediocre 7 win team with the softest schedule I can ever remember having and got their you know what kicked in their bowl game. I want the Hawks to be great too but there has to be some realism involved with analyzing what's out there too.
That makes my point for me. The BIG west was bad and we were worse.... And who's not to say those other schools are that bad again this year?That many starters back from a team that was 5 points away from winning the big 10 west is pretty good. This team will be at least 5 points better to at least be in better position to win it this year.