hawkdrummer1
Well-Known Member
I tend to agree. I always scoffed at the baseball purists and their outrage at "stealing signs". Please. Reading your opponent is a key part of any sport.I really don't know the NCAA rules, but my guess would be the recording of the signals. I don't know if it's illegal to send someone to a game to try to steal signals. I don't see a problem with it, but that's just me.
As a baseball coach, I have kids assigned to writing down all touch sequences to see what the other team's signs are. I also have a running list of numbers that teams call out for signs. There aren't many teams I don't have signs for, which is why I hate coaching changes. Is this unethical? I say no way. If I wasn't supposed to steal signs, we should all close our eyes while the catcher holds up 1 finger or 2. When a team is stealing signals from 2nd base from my catcher, I sure as heck don't get mad at the base runner. That's just good baseball. I also relay to our hitters what pitch is coming when the pitcher tips his pitches. There aren't many pitchers I can't figure out. Similar to FB coaches. If you see something often enough, it's easy to steal. If someone can steal them by watching, I have no problems with it (not sure if the NCAA agrees). If the signs are recorded, I have a problem with that.
Where Michigan appears to have gone over the top, is somehow getting the guy on the sidelines across from their next opponent. That and using electronic devices to record is over the top.