Cyclones17
Well-Known Member
Hard to discount a guy who finished 2nd in the heisman - he was GREAT. Without his leadership that team would have lost 4 games instead of 2 imo
Strongly disagree. The guy couldn't beat out Kyle McCann the year before. You guys won because of many reasons. Banks is one of them but not THE reason.
Like I've said he had one of the best OL in college football history blocking for him. That gave him all day to throw the football. That also gave him a great running game. That great running game gave him a very effective play action pass. With that play action pass he had very good WR's to throw to and the Best TE in Iowa history as well. Then you throw in the fact that the Big 10 was horrible that year and he didn't play anybody that was any good and you can see why he got as much pub as he did.
Banks wasn't even one of the top 3 players on that offense that season