I agree that in the PAST donors had a lot of influence on the football program. That landscape has changed significantly with the Big Ten Channel handing out over sixty million dollars every year to each big ten school. Even the wealthiest of donors doesn’t come close to that. Thinking back I remember amounts from the big donors ranging between one and two million dollars. That was huge in the programs of school but the BTN has changed the landscape of everything.
I think the Kirk’s reign would be looked at with a little more scrutiny if revenue was generated the way it was back in the days of Coach Fry. Ticket revenue, tv commercial revenue, and bowl game pay outs ( that’s what made the New Years Day bowls so important). That two million dollar payout from the rose bowl back then was very important. Even if there was only $750,000 left over after the rose bowl trip expenses, that left over money was appreciated by the University. Also as you point out the donors one million dollar donations was huge back then.
Sixty effing million dollars to the University of Iowa every year, and that figure is going to keep going up. That money has allowed a lot of patience for most head coaches (not named Michigan) in the Big Ten. You can bet your bottom dollar that Minnesota would not have those new facilities without the BTN money.
So whether it’s the AD, Board of Regents, University President, or huge donors, some where there is a serious weak link for the enthusiasm for higher expectations for this football program.
I can’t help but wonder who some of the posters are on this board who seem happy to support Kirk with the 7-5 seasons year after year after year? It should be the wish of every fan to strive for a divisional title. It doesn’t mean you have to reach it every year but as weak as our division is we should be winning it at the VERY LEASTonce every three years if not every other year.
So who are these people. Kirk relatives? Kirk’s neighbors? People who go to church with him and his family? Weak sauce fans who are those types who just like the game day environment regardless of results? Of course it’s their right to support the team and coaches regardless of their reasons, but it’s painful for those who want more. For those of us who believe the facilities, fan support, and revenue should be good enough to be better than what we are. Don’t have to say much other than to point at Wisconsin’s example. I get sick to the stomach just thinking about how we owned the badgers under Coach Fry. Yes, I realize that the BTN has leveled the field, but in the same breath there is absolutely no reason we can’t play at that level, well other than coaching and recruiting.