MelroseHawkins
Well-Known Member
...... man up now and state why. We've heard the negative and from those wanting change. What about reasons why you think we should stay the course. I'd be interested.
...... man up now and state why. We've heard the negative and from those wanting change. What about reasons why you think we should stay the course. I'd be interested.
WTF??
Of course 7 wins isn't where Iowa wants to be and this year really
sucked.
That being said, I don't want to be ANYTHING like Nebraska, so
I don't give a rat's patooey if they fired Pelini.
If anyone here suggesting a change now, had ANY clue, who we would get,
Steve Alford? perhaps I'd listen. But, as of right now, it's all just noise and bluster.
1) He runs a clean program. yes, there have been run-ins with the law, but mostly alcohol related, which is pretty standard for that age group of young men. There were a couple of MUCH worse incidents, but less, (IMHO) than most any other Power 5 conference team over the last 16 years. Iowa City police have .... hmmm, I will just leave it alone.
2) He is a winner.
3) We have a winning program. We do not win every game, but we have a winning program that gets to bowl games
4) Kirk, and the program have INTEGRITY. Many do not. They will sell their soul and cheat to win. See the SEC.
5) we play TOUGH, hard-nosed, physical football. If we wanted to play Chip Kelley style football, we simply cannot recruit to that level here in Iowa. Kirk recruits to a certain brand of football. That brand of football had the kind of kids we can recruit here in mind from day 1. Mr. Davis Osborne knew he could not consistantly bring in the elite skill position players, so he built those Nebraska teams around toughness in the trenches and running the football.
Can you find reasons to let him go? Sure. Be careful what you wish for...
We simply need a new/different Offensive Coordinator who believes in the VERTICAL passing game, running the ball and taking advantage of the excellent TEs we always have here.
And someone to explain to KIRK how the management of the closck at the end of halves and games shuold be handled. Goodness.
1) He runs a clean program. yes, there have been run-ins with the law, but mostly alcohol related, which is pretty standard for that age group of young men. There were a couple of MUCH worse incidents, but less, (IMHO) than most any other Power 5 conference team over the last 16 years. Iowa City police have .... hmmm, I will just leave it alone.
2) He is a winner.
3) We have a winning program. We do not win every game, but we have a winning program that gets to bowl games
4) Kirk, and the program have INTEGRITY. Many do not. They will sell their soul and cheat to win. See the SEC.
5) we play TOUGH, hard-nosed, physical football. If we wanted to play Chip Kelley style football, we simply cannot recruit to that level here in Iowa. Kirk recruits to a certain brand of football. That brand of football had the kind of kids we can recruit here in mind from day 1. Mr. Davis Osborne knew he could not consistantly bring in the elite skill position players, so he built those Nebraska teams around toughness in the trenches and running the football.
Can you find reasons to let him go? Sure. Be careful what you wish for...
We simply need a new/different Offensive Coordinator who believes in the VERTICAL passing game, running the ball and taking advantage of the excellent TEs we always have here.
And someone to explain to KIRK how the management of the closck at the end of halves and games shuold be handled. Goodness.
This post got -5 thumbs down but I think this is the whole issue. Either KF and Greg Davis need to open it up downfield or they need to get out of the way. We really arent seeing pro style football here. Either a new OC or change to more attacking down the field passing attack which opens up running lanes.
On defense I say Phil Parker needs to upgrade the safety position because we are losing a ton of jump ball situations.
When you make self destructive choices like playing Rudock over CJ, to me that speaks to a much bigger issue, even to the point of questioning your mental state.
I don't want to see him go out like this. I really don't. I'd love for him to have another few laps around the track, right the ship and prepare the place for the next coach...that would be ideal, as I respect him a great deal.
But I think that would require more change from him than I think he has shown to be capable of.
I don't want to see him go out like this. I really don't. I'd love for him to have another few laps around the track, right the ship and prepare the place for the next coach...that would be ideal, as I respect him a great deal.
But I think that would require more change from him than I think he has shown to be capable of.
I think coaching changes are the single most mishandled part of the college game. It’s generally done to appease those that are most opposed to the current coach, and generally flushes most of what has been accomplished straight down the toilet. Alveraz as Wisconsin AD has probably been the most successful at handing the transitions while keeping the teams assets intact. It doesn’t always work. Tiller tried to transition at Purdue but they couldn’t recruit the quality QB & WR’s required to keep the whole “basketball on turf†thing going. I would hate to pitch the player development program, a defense that is usually good, and the local knowledge gained over the years for some random name from the second tier of coaching ranks. Too many schools fire their coaches with a year or two remaining on their contracts and without a real plan, and it’s almost always a disaster.