Andrew Luck or Robert Griffin III

"How good can Luck be when Wake Forest held him to 17 points. Wake Forest!"

As you're insinuating, I agree that the points against is not a good barometer. But Stanford scored 68 points against Wake Forest two years ago when they played, not 17. I think Stanford's lowest point total in a game this past season was 28.
 
Actually most pro scouts consider RG3 to be a far superior pocket passer.
I am not saying that this isnt true, but where did you get this information? Based on what I have read most pro scouts agree that Andrew Luck is the most NFL ready QB since John Elway. He played in a pro style offense, and against better defenses than RG3. They are similar in arm strength, luck would have an edge in accuracy (I know they had similar complete percentages, but RG3's spread O focused on short to intermediate routes), and RG3 is the better athlete. Both can be successful QBs in the NFL, but it seems like Luck would carry the least risk as his transition to the NFL would present less of a learning curve.
I've just heard it said many times on espn and during games. Not saying he is more ready just that he is a better pocket passer. Luck likes to leave the pocket often as he likes roll out passes.
 
"How good can Luck be when Wake Forest held him to 17 points. Wake Forest!"

As you're insinuating, I agree that the points against is not a good barometer. But Stanford scored 68 points against Wake Forest two years ago when they played, not 17. I think Stanford's lowest point total in a game this past season was 28.

This is where I got the info that says it was Wake beating Stanford 28-17, but as you correctly stated I just brought it up to show how irrelevant it is.

Stanford Cardinal vs. Wake Forest Demon Deacons - Recap - September 12, 2009 - ESPN
 
Griffin wore superman socks to heisman ceremony....I take Luck everytime. If im spending millions I want a qb that doesn't have a massive ego. A student of the game...aka not jamarcus russell

A triple facepalm wouldn't even begin to do justice to the amount of "fail" in this post. Griffin has personality, not an ego. He is quite possibly the most humble, well-spoken athlete (who also happens to be among the very best at what he does) I've ever seen. It's not tough to find athletes who maybe aren't all that great, and have them be humble. It's the guys like Griffin, who maintain the utmost humility despite people treating him like a rockstar, that are pretty rare.

Did you see the Gameday piece on him this fall, not long after Halloween? He walked all over campus with a hockey mask (Jason-style) all night so he WOULDN'T be recognized. He just wants to blend in when it comes to that sort of stuff. If he had an ego, he'd go around in a letter jacket pounding and puffing his chest all night.

Long story short: Griffin is much more like Nile Kinnick than he is Matt Leinart.
 
Last edited:
Personally, I'd take Griffin. His upside is quite a bit higher than Luck's (which is really saying something). Luck is probably the safer pick, which is why he'll go #1. But if someone were to trade up for Griffin, someone who could afford to keep him on the bench for a couple years, then he could be a great one. Just think: a guy with his arm strength, accuracy, athleticism, and smarts holding a clipboard behind Peyton in Miami for a couple years? That's a deadly recipe for the rest of the NFL.

This is the trap I fell for in Ryan Leaf you see the big arm, the mobility, the size and you become mesmerized by it......You take the safer pick, you take the better version of Matt Ryan and you build around it for the next decade.
 
This is the trap I fell for in Ryan Leaf you see the big arm, the mobility, the size and you become mesmerized by it......You take the safer pick, you take the better version of Matt Ryan and you build around it for the next decade.

The key difference between Griffin and Leaf is the mental and personality aspect. Griffin, IMO, is the TOTAL package, skill and intangibles. So is Luck. Leaf didn't have the intangibles.
 
Ryan Leaf, much like Nuke LaLoosh, had a million dollar arm and a ten cent head.

This doesn't seem to be the case with Griffin.
 
I didn’t read this whole thread but the same things that I continually marvel at are present in here. He has a higher ceiling…?!?! Based on what, being fast and athletic….? He isn’t a no-brainer QB….I think he has a shot for sure, but there have been better, more polished, just as athletic QB’s fail before…..Really the same things we process to come up with our beliefs about our coaches and teams are the same that are prevalent in here…..

If Peyton Manning, Dan Marino, Joe Montana and Tom Brady were all coming out tomorrow with RG3 everyone & their dog would be saying RG3 has a better upside…?! And I say based on what…..and what proof is there that he is smarter than Mike Vick, who I personally love….he is at least accountable like most aren’t ….and clearly not a better athlete. Its highly debatable he throws a better ball for that matter. And with all Vicks tools, it isn’t his legs that win games, Peyton Manning and Tom Brady will always be better NFL QB’s than guys like RG3, until they prove otherwise.

And for that matter spread QB’s have a loooonnnngggg uphill battle in the NFL.
 
Last edited:
luck is an obvious number 1. griffin has great potential but there is only 1 spot he has more upside in than luck and that is speed. arm strength = luck, footwork = luck (most shotgun qbs have bad footwork and have to learn this. cam newton had good footwork and rg3 has lazy feet), accurracy = luck (out of the gun you have more time and windows tend to be bigger when you have 4 wrs vs luck who many times had 1 or 2 wrs and 1 or 2 tes).

speed i will give you goes to griffin by far. in fact i wouldnt be surprised to see the fastest 40 be by rg3. he has true track speed something many fb players dont have because they carry about 15 to 20 lbs of wt more than they would have if they were just running track. rg3 is a world class 400 hurdler. arguably the most athletic running event in track. there has never been a qb with this type of speed. cam newton and tebow are more power than speed (not even close to him). vick in his prime wasnt as fast as this kid. in fact if it wasnt for the fact he would be focusing more on his throwing than running in prepping for the combine i would go as far as saying he may run a faster 40 than chris johnson did.

rg3 is solid but not the #1 pick when there is andrew luck.
 
The key difference between Griffin and Leaf is the mental and personality aspect. Griffin, IMO, is the TOTAL package, skill and intangibles. So is Luck. Leaf didn't have the intangibles.

This is an age issue I am twice your age as you get older you become more conservative, you take less risk. I see a guy that has been groomed to be a NFL QB since he was 8 versus a converted track star.

RG3 is a good dude, a smart guy.....But I am not going to take a chance that I get Blaine Gabbert instead of Cam Newton. With spread QB(s) you just don't know. Luck is no guarantee, but he is pretty close.
 
I didn’t read this whole thread but the same things that I continually marvel at are present in here. He has a higher ceiling…?!?! Based on what, being fast and athletic….? He isn’t a no-brainer QB….I think he has a shot for sure, but there have been better, more polished, just as athletic QB’s fail before…..Really the same things we process to come up with our beliefs about our coaches and teams are the same that are prevalent in here…..

If Peyton Manning, Dan Marino, Joe Montana and Tom Brady were all coming out tomorrow with RG3 everyone & their dog would be saying RG3 has a better upside…?! And I say based on what…..and what proof is there that he is smarter than Mike Vick, who I personally love….he is at least accountable like most aren’t ….and clearly not a better athlete. Its highly debatable he throws a better ball for that matter. And with all Vicks tools, it isn’t his legs that win games, Peyton Manning and Tom Brady will always be better NFL QB’s than guys like RG3, until they prove otherwise.

And for that matter spread QB’s have a loooonnnngggg uphill battle in the NFL.

There are precious few "no-brainer" QB's, and a good portion of those guys fail, too. Griffin has more upside because he has all, or nearly all, of the tools. And the ones he may not have (footwork, reading a defense) are the ones that can be taught. And he is precisely the kind of coach-able athlete that you want in that situation.

Proof that he's smarter than Vick? I can't give you IQ scores, but just compare the two when they talk (and FTR, we have to compare him to pre-dogfighting Vick). Vick was a dogfighter, and Griffin is going to law school. If that's not enough, then you're just arguing for arguing's sake.
 
I didn’t read this whole thread but the same things that I continually marvel at are present in here. He has a higher ceiling…?!?! Based on what, being fast and athletic….? He isn’t a no-brainer QB….I think he has a shot for sure, but there have been better, more polished, just as athletic QB’s fail before…..Really the same things we process to come up with our beliefs about our coaches and teams are the same that are prevalent in here…..

If Peyton Manning, Dan Marino, Joe Montana and Tom Brady were all coming out tomorrow with RG3 everyone & their dog would be saying RG3 has a better upside…?! And I say based on what…..and what proof is there that he is smarter than Mike Vick, who I personally love….he is at least accountable like most aren’t ….and clearly not a better athlete. Its highly debatable he throws a better ball for that matter. And with all Vicks tools, it isn’t his legs that win games, Peyton Manning and Tom Brady will always be better NFL QB’s than guys like RG3, until they prove otherwise.

And for that matter spread QB’s have a loooonnnngggg uphill battle in the NFL.

Baylor University || Baylor Nation || Baylor University Celebrates First-ever Heisman Award Winner Robert Griffin III
Earned his bachelor's degree in Political Science in just 3 years at Baylor
On track to complete his master's degree next spring

vs....

NFL star indicted over dog fighting - CNN

c'mon chad
 
This is an age issue I am twice your age as you get older you become more conservative, you take less risk. I see a guy that has been groomed to be a NFL QB since he was 8 versus a converted track star.

How did that work out for Mike Nolan and the 49ers who took the sure thing in Alex Smith over Aaron Rodgers?
 
Really, really....this is what we are going to use...I suppose you realise Ted Bundy and Charles Mason both about a 160 IQ, right?!

1. Realize
2. You realize Vick has offered up a career's worth of poor decisions, both on and off the field, that demonstrate he's not too bright? His interviews (at least before the dogfighting) were often brutal to listen to.

If you prefer we don't compare Griffin to Vick, how about Vince Young? Or are we going to pretend that Young isn't dumber than a box of rocks, just because we don't have access to his IQ score?
 

Latest posts

Top