If anyone thinks we r in good hands with a 113th ranked offense, I say keep dreaming all the way to the bottom of the big ten(which sucks!)
with Banks,Iowa was rated 103rd nationally Offensively, when they faced USC in KF'S 1ST OB season
If anyone thinks we r in good hands with a 113th ranked offense, I say keep dreaming all the way to the bottom of the big ten(which sucks!)
with Banks,Iowa was rated 103rd nationally Offensively, when they faced USC in KF'S 1ST OB season
with Banks,Iowa was rated 103rd nationally Offensively, when they faced USC in KF'S 1ST OB season
also under TATE in 2004 Iowa's offense was rated 83rd with 2 other teams
with Stanzi in 2009 OB winning seasons the Offense was rated 83rd
Iowa has never been a strong point on offense, KF teams win with Defense
also under TATE in 2004 Iowa's offense was rated 83rd with 2 other teams
with Stanzi in 2009 OB winning seasons the Offense was rated 83rd
Iowa has never been a strong point on offense, KF teams win with Defense
these all come fron ESPN data base on stats, and these are based on the info from the Iowa's Sportsinfo department, Idon't have to make these up
My God. How does one stop the sheer idiocy?
is that all you can do is rely on name calling?According to the NCAA stats website:
Iowa total offense (2002): 13th (only off by one, I guess)
Passing offense: 63rd
Rushing offense: 17th
Scoring offense: T7th
http://web1.ncaa.org/d1mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2002&div=4&rpt=IA_teamtotoff&site=org
Play around with that and see what you see. Idiot.
The defense has carried the team in more years than not. But 2002 wasn't one of them.
is that all you can do is rely on name calling?
is that all you can do is rely on name calling?
Should he rely on made stats? Would that be better you stupid mother ******?
Should he rely on made stats? Would that be better you stupid mother ******?
Made up stats>name calling>commas
Made up stats>name calling>commas
Made up stats>name calling>commas