First off, Michigan's D isn't remotely close to the caliber of PSU's. We should have little to no problems scoring in this game and if we go with a methodical ground and pound attack, it will tire out their already weak D and keep their potent O off the field and hopefully not able to have many opportunities for big plays.
Michigan also has not faced a stiff D yet this season and MSU should expose many of their weaknesses on O giving us a good game plan to contain Denard as best as possible.
First off, Michigan's D isn't remotely close to the caliber of PSU's. We should have little to no problems scoring in this game and if we go with a methodical ground and pound attack, it will tire out their already weak D and keep their potent O off the field and hopefully not able to have many opportunities for big plays.
Michigan also has not faced a stiff D yet this season and MSU should expose many of their weaknesses on O giving us a good game plan to contain Denard as best as possible.
First off... it sure will if Michigan can't score, and secondly... IF Iowa needs more they will just run the offense instead of basically taking a knee like they did the entire 2nd half yesterday. I have been watching Football for 40 years and have never seen a team F with a team like Iowa did Penn State yesterday. It was more insulting than running up the score IMO. KF was sending a message and that was the plan from the get go. The players came out from the beginning of the game doing the SHHHH! gesture. Just don't show anyone your capability, I mean even Penn State fans think that game was close... very calculating and true to form. The best part? Nobody outside the B10 really watches Iowa games and only checks final scores. They will think the offense actually tried to put points on the board!!! We gave less film for defensive coordinators to review. In reality no opponent is going to watch that film and think Iowa just "takes a knee" on offense as a scoring strategy... they will see that after the fact. I think the fans of our opponents while watching the game don't see that because it is completely opposite of what every other team in college football does. We just know this from watching all of our games. The Hawkeyes completely toyed with Penn State all game, and it was hilarious.
ever hear the phrase 'if you don't use it, you lose it'? you make valid points, and it may yet work out to Iowa's advantage. my concern is when they try to go for more of the deep stuff and variety on offense - the timing won't be there because they haven't actually run it through at game speed in a live environment.
Following are the Michigan Defensive rankings through yesterday's games:
Rushing Defense: 37
Pass Eff. Defense: 79
Total Defense: 102
Scoring Defense: 73
Pass Defense: 120
Sacks: 88
Tackles For Loss: T-61
NCAA.com ? The Official Website of NCAA Championships - Football
The only reason their Rush Defense is not ranked lower is because their Pass D is dead last in FBS! Teams don't have to run against them because they give up big chunks of yards through the air.
We are guaranteed to see a different offensive game plan in two weeks. QB and WR/TE are the strengths of our offense. I would be licking my chops if I were RS, MM, DJK, AR, etc.
Control of the line of scrimmage, time of possession and limiting DRob's opportunities are the keys to the game, IMHO.
Go Hawks!
I am not sure what it is. The team looks unstoppable in first quarter or so then goes to sleep. I would hope its because they don't want to show anything more than they have to, but not sure what else there might be. It seems we have no killer instinct or focus. If we allow D Robinson to stand up and finish the game, we better have a ton of ball control.
They get to practice nearly daily against the #1 defense in college football.