Search results

Yes it's not the old big east, but I could see somebody make the argument that it's a better basketball conference then the pac 12. Which makes it the 4th or 5th best basketball conference

If the big east does dissolve and the speculation is the 7 teams will start their own league and add 3 to 5 teams. Names being floating on some reports is Xavier, Dayton, Creighton, Butler, St.Louis. Combined with Georgetown, Depaul, Marquette, Villanova, Providence, St.Johns, and Seton hall...

Think about how bad Cincinnati and UConn may get screwed in all this. Not only are they stuck in a horrible football league, but if these 7 leave, their great basketball programs maybe left in horrible basketball league too.

I really don't think they just merge with the A-10 to form this 21 team conference. I mean how profitable would that be to split basketball only money between 21 teams. If I was them I'd split and form a new basketball only conference and cherry pick the best midwest/east midmajor teams...

I'm jealous, I'd so trade our BTN check for their Cyclones.tv check.

Doubt it derby stats this year pretty much crap Rushing AJ Derby, 51 194 Passing G Effic Att Cmp Int Pct Yds TD Long Avg/G AJ Derby, 10 110.9 321 149 14 0.46 1935 22 72 193.5

Thanks clonedude, good luck next year when you lose lucious/Babb/McGee/Booker/Clyburn, we lose may and gain Jok/Uthoff. You got one dance and now your going to be starting over in year 4. Good strategy Freddie....

LOL didn't mean to rain on the parade, good win loved the game. But still got a ways to go before we play in March.

Wins at home against probable NIT teams doesn't mean we're back. When we make the dance, that's when we're back

Give mad respect to a post like this that was bumbed from 2009 after the orange bowl, but I'm sure the OP felt the same way back then, no question about it.

Whoever the 3 people were that voted for other, that's an impressive prediction.

it just depends if they are clearly the 2 best teams then yeah, but if michigan and nebraska are basically the same I think people would rather watch a different matchup.

Not when they played the game a week earlier, if they say played early in the season it would be, but nobody ever wants to see a rerun of the week before. It'd be a lot bigger ratings if they didn't play back to back. I mean let's say this year if OSU beats michigan saturday wouldn't you...

Yes anytime a team plays the last week of the season and then turns around and plays a week later, it's "BIG" ratings

Western Kentucky vs Iowa Live Stream Online

Jon why don't you and Deace do a podcast on this. Back in the day you guys breaking down the conference was the best radio. Love to hear a podcast of you guys breaking down current realignments.

All good points, but I think the "national perception" is the big ten sucks. Moving forward Penn State isn't your daddy's Penn state and may never be again. Penn state has one championship to Wisconsin 5 since joining the conference all of their tradation is over 30 years ago. Fans you can't...

I don't think you understand how a pod system would work. It would still be 2 divisons every year just every 2 years the pods switch divisions. Fox example say ND and BC joined it might look something like this Pod A Wisc/Neb/Iowa/minn Pod B Mich/MSU/Ill/NW Pod C OSU/Ind/Rut/Mary Pod D...

Also if you had the divisions as I proposed the overall records since 93 would be West 898-718 to East 904-693. Which is pretty even and when you consider in there that PSU will lose more and Rutgers and Maryland you could expect to lose more since they will be playing harder schedules then...

Why is everybody so concerned with Penn state like they are top 3 power in the big ten. They weren't even before the Sandusky scandal. Wisconsin and Nebraska are both bigger powers in the big ten then Penn state was before the scandal and will be after. If you look at the big 6 records since...