~Iowa's 2019 NCAA Resume Quadrant Breakdown~

JG10Hawk

JG10Hawk

Well-Known Member
NET Quadrants per NCAA:
  • Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75
  • Quadrant 2: Home 31-75, Neutral 51-100, Away 76-135
  • Quadrant 3: Home 76-160, Neutral 101-200, Away 135-240
  • Quadrant 4: Home 161-353, Neutral 201-353, Away 241-353
upload_2019-3-6_11-23-29.png

*excludes additional Quadrant 1, 2, or 3 Big Ten Tournament game/s

Last Updated: 3/6/19
  • Updated for games through 3/4/19
  • Surprisingly no quadrant changes for any of the games since my last update on 2/18/19
  • Iowa gained a Q2 win but also added 2 Q1 losses and 1 Q3 loss
 
Last edited:


I'm not real up to speed on the new ranking system.. What's a good URL to bookmark for this stuff? I can't see much on ESPN other than their BPI, and AP/Coaches polls.
 




1977Hawkeye said:
I'm not real up to speed on the new ranking system.. What's a good URL to bookmark for this stuff? I can't see much on ESPN other than their BPI, and AP/Coaches polls.
Click to expand...

NCAA NET Rankings:

https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/basketball-men/d1/ncaa-mens-basketball-net-rankings

Quadrant data you see above is from a spreadsheet I created pulling in data from the first link(above) and applying the Quadrant system rules the NCAA released (link below).

https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketbal...ed-ncaa-adopts-new-college-basketball-ranking
 






First thing I notice is that Lunardi has Nevada as a #1 seed, but they are #28 in the NET rankings. So who's full of beans? :)
 


1977Hawkeye said:
First thing I notice is that Lunardi has Nevada as a #1 seed, but they are #28 in the NET rankings. So who's full of beans? :)
Click to expand...

Keep in mind Lunardi's last update was Jan 4th. The NET through Jan 3rd had Nevada at #8 when they were undefeated and were yet to get obliterated by New Mexico.

A lot can happen in a few days :)
 


JG10Hawk said:
NET Quadrants per NCAA:
  • Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75
  • Quadrant 2: Home 31-75, Neutral 51-100, Away 76-135
  • Quadrant 3: Home 76-160, Neutral 101-200, Away 135-240
  • Quadrant 4: Home 161-353, Neutral 201-353, Away 241-353

View attachment 4797
*excludes additional Quadrant 1, 2, or 3 Big Ten Tournament game/s

There is a ton of opportunity left. Currently no bad losses with all 3 being quadrant 1. Losing to Illinois or Rutgers at home would be the only potential major blemishes remaining on the schedule.
Click to expand...

Could you post this updated throughout the season? Very cool.
 


Xerxes said:
Could you post this updated throughout the season? Very cool.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. The meat of the work is already done. I just have to refresh the queries when the new rankings come out and add in the W or L in the W/L column. That's the hope anyways barring any broken formulas or changes to the format of data brought in somewhere.
 


JG10Hawk said:
NET Quadrants per NCAA:
  • Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75
  • Quadrant 2: Home 31-75, Neutral 51-100, Away 76-135
  • Quadrant 3: Home 76-160, Neutral 101-200, Away 135-240
  • Quadrant 4: Home 161-353, Neutral 201-353, Away 241-353

View attachment 4797
*excludes additional Quadrant 1, 2, or 3 Big Ten Tournament game/s

There is a ton of opportunity left. Currently no bad losses with all 3 being quadrant 1. Losing to Illinois or Rutgers at home would be the only potential major blemishes remaining on the schedule.
Click to expand...
I love this type of information...hard data rather than random opinions. Thanks for sharing!
 








InGoodCo said:
oh it still could.

So, i asked this in another post, but it probably belongs here. NW Net is currently 56, so, tomorrow nights road game is a chance for another QUAD 1 win right?
Click to expand...

From above:
  • Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75

upload_2019-1-8_14-20-33.png

So yes, they would be considered a quad 1 as long as they stay in the top 75 of the NET.
 






I still want to know how the selection committee will view the NET rankings when it comes time to pick teams and assign seeds. Do they still give their biased "eyeball test" or do they go strictly off the rankings? This new ranking system would be pretty pointless still if they just seeded and selected teams however the eff they want
 




Uconn, Pitt and Oregon all seem to be in a free fall...so that sucks

Iowa State should stay a quadrant 1 win all season long...Nebraska ***should*** stick as a Q1, but they haven't looked great in conference play so far
 


You must log in or register to reply here.


Latest posts

Share this page






Top