Really? Is it really far fetched that someone drunk on a scooter could be swerving in traffic or run a red light to cause a serious accident? Wow... Just wow.. Trying to downplay or justify being able to drink and drive is pretty reprehensible.. It's such an avoidable thing that I'm glad that the folks that are unfortunate victims of others doing it can legally go after them for all they've got.When you have to make up that crazy of a scenario to prove a point, I would say it wasn't probably very dangerous. Stupid, yes. But dangerous as far as people dying goes? Not really. Now if he was on a crotch rocket doing 90 down the interstate and blew a .2 I would say he was being dangerous.
Really? Is it really far fetched that someone drunk on a scooter could be swerving in traffic or run a red light to cause a serious accident? Wow... Just wow.. Trying to downplay or justify being able to drink and drive is pretty reprehensible.. It's such an avoidable thing that I'm glad that the folks that are unfortunate victims of others doing it can legally go after them for all they've got.
But the said drunk driver isn't supposed to be on the road to begin with. That is where they get 100% of the fault. Same as someone driving without a license. Are bikes dangerous on the roads to begin with? You bet they are for those reasons you mentioned and more. But again your moving the goal posts...Not far fetched as in absolutely impossible to happen. Just extremely unlikely to the point where it's more likely the sober driver in the car didn't see him and caused it. You want to talk about dangerous, that's a big time danger. Cars not seeing motorcycles.
But the said drunk driver isn't supposed to be on the road to begin with. That is where they get 100% of the fault. Same as someone driving without a license. Are bikes dangerous on the roads to begin with? You bet they are for those reasons you mentioned and more. But again your moving the goal posts...
But the said drunk driver isn't supposed to be on the road to begin with. That is where they get 100% of the fault. Same as someone driving without a license. Are bikes dangerous on the roads to begin with? You bet they are for those reasons you mentioned and more. But again your moving the goal posts...
Rieff got screwed by shitty cops. He wasn't underage and he was peaceably looking for a ride. That is not now nor ever been a crime in my eyes.
Wirfs on the other hand is underage and was driving. He is the one that deserves a game suspension. Since Kirk has already announced Rieff' s punishment it likely means he will have to up the ante on Wirfs though. This really sucks as we all know though because O-line is already an inexperienced group. I wish Kirk would amend Rieff's suspension to half a game and say in light of further offenses Rieff's incident no longer seems as bad. Then go ahead and give Wirfs the full game suspension and then send dumb dumb to "scared straight". Maybe even throw on 100 hours of community service.
I would include the housewares section also. I don't want my Diamond paper matches to be unable to light because they are sopping wet or damp.....
View attachment 3853
Really? Is it really far fetched that someone drunk on a scooter could be swerving in traffic or run a red light to cause a serious accident? Wow... Just wow.. Trying to downplay or justify being able to drink and drive is pretty reprehensible.. It's such an avoidable thing that I'm glad that the folks that are unfortunate victims of others doing it can legally go after them for all they've got.
The last thing they want to do is hand out public intox tickets.
Exhibit A: The police video earlier in this thread.
There is significant risk of danger in any vehicle that is increased when OWI.
If you lived in IC for 36 years like I have you would know the first thing they want to do is hand out public intox tickets.