NorthKCHawk
Well-Known Member
You are overstating a bit what KF took over. Hayden left the cupboard pretty bare and KF had to rebuild things pretty much from the ground up. I agree that what Hayden did was more impressive, but continuing the analogy, what KF walked into was a hell of a lot closer to what Fran inherited than what Mr. Davis did.The situation Hayden took over was considerably worse than what he left KF. He turned around a program in the shitter for almost two decades. He broke through the OSU-Michigan strangle hold on the conference, helping other programs in the league do the same. He built the program and its resources up to pave the way for KF’s success.
And that’s just on-field success. We’re only three years removed from a pretty significant scandal in KF’s program that Hayden didn’t have happen in his program. And then there’s the nepotism. Hayden’s son wanted on the Iowa staff badly but Hayden wouldn’t hire him because he knew the of the potential issues, which KF can’t see. That also matters.
KF deserves credit for keeping what Hayden built going but Hayden is the goat of Iowa Football coaches. Nothing you say will change my mind on that.
As for scandals, that holds little sway for me. Totally different era. Hayden did not have to deal with social media, the internet and all of the things that amplify the smallest of wrongdoing. Also, KF's biggest scandal, alleged racial biased in his program, would not have even been a topic in the 80s. Hell, Fry is so old he actually integrated the SWAC. But, that is not to say that Black football players in the 80s were treated in the type of manner that is expected today. No way. As for nepotism, that is not a scandal, its just dumb head coaching IMHO. KF still won 10 games twice with his dimwitty son as OC.
You are biased. I get it. We all are. You will never convince me that Jordan is not the GOAT in basketball. 10 years ago I would have agreed with you on Fry. But, KF's record demonstrably exceeds Fry's. Its just the objective truth.