I don't know if you're saying "the one we really needed" because we are not sure if we will get Atwood or not. But, he would be an immediate contributor and would bring some toughness to our team. He definitely would make us better.
Iowa can absolutely use Atwood. This guy is physical and can score down low - something we struggled with this season.
No, I said it because I believe it.
Pretty comfortable that White is better than Atwood. Where I think Atwood would help is in the following season when Gabe and White leave but maybe Uhl will prove to be ready.
Iowa needed a playmaker more than anything and got it in Dickerson
No, I said it because I believe it.
Pretty comfortable that White is better than Atwood. Where I think Atwood would help is in the following season when Gabe and White leave but maybe Uhl will prove to be ready.
Iowa needed a playmaker more than anything and got it in Dickerson
This is why you're not coaching! You're clueless!
So, Iowa needed a playmaker and got Dickerson. How about we get two playmakers? That has to be better than just getting one. And White and Atwood can both be on the floor at the same time.
Atwood is more of a 3 than a 4. The myth of him being a pure 4 is just that - a myth.
QUOTE=wundergrape;1297107]Atwood is more of a 3 than a 4. The myth of him being a pure 4 is just that - a myth.
I would have to agree. He has some 3 skills for sure. And something Aaron White does not have - an outside shot! The guy can actually make a 3 pt shot...
Atwood shot 21% from three last year. White probably had a higher percentage. The line that I saw was almost 30% from 3pt land... But it was from watching his videos that made me think he had a good outside shot.
The line that I saw was almost 30% from 3pt land... But it was from watching his videos that made me think he had a good outside shot.