First, the suggestions by some that Nike is somehow involved in the Selby decommitment is silly. Selby decommitted from UT cause that flex offense doesn't do good at putting pros in the league. Has nothing to do with shoes. I know because I had long conversations with Maeshon (his mom) where she made this concern known MANY TIMES....and this was long before there was any real "connection" between Selby and Nike handlers. It's a made up story.... nothing more than a bunch of drama to sell papers and get hits.
Second, if Iowa is going to stay away from coaches who can recruit top AAU teams, Iowa will lose many games. But to suggest that Noodle and Forbes work in anywhere NEAR the same manner is inaccurate as well. Forbes enjoys a great reputation where Neal has had many suspicions raised.
mm
Your response somewhat misunderstands the thrust of my remarks. If you noted it, I very explicitly did not express any opinion on the controversy centering upon the kid from Baltimore. Nor did I suggest that Iowa could or should avoid HS kids who play AAU ball in the summer (wouldn't have much of a pond to fish in if it did).
You may be overlooking an important factor of perspective. Your posts, as I would expect, reflect your long & extensive experience dealing with AAU programs, and the HS kids being recruited. You are familiar with the facts of the recruitment of the Baltimore youngster. On the other hand, you don't have experience with the U of Iowa administration, the Hawkeye basketball program, or the details of how Iowa got hugely embarassed by the Alford-Neal involvement with some AAU hustlers, several of the most scandalous "prep academies"--and the extent to which the key administrative players at Iowa are on guard against getting burned again.
What you may not realize is that the U of Iowa has a very matriarchal power structure, with particularly a lot of weight being thrown around by faculty & staff in the UI Hospitals & Clinics (largest teaching hospital in the USA), physical & occupational therapy--activists who while not hostile have priorities not especially sympathetic to the Iowa men's basketball program as it has operated the last ten years.
My point is you may know that there is no substance to suspicions about Forbes relationship with AAU programs, the best or the dubious either one; and you may know in his role as a recruited at Tennessee & previous positions he has conducted him admirably....BUT the middle-aged women who President Mason put on the search committee SHE APPOINTED have not had personal experience with AAU programs, they have no reason to have even heard of the kid from Baltimore. But there is no way to say this tactfully, but the hard truth is that most people at Iowa who have any real interest in college athletics tend to have negative views of the SEC & its member schools (including KY), and strongly suspect that the programs are corrupt to some degree or other, including & especially recruiting. These women live and play their roles on the Iowa faculty in a milieu where AAU programs are suspect, and Forbes' career since leaving Iowa juco ball has been spent in programs that raise the collective eyebrow of Iowans.
May be foolish. May be without a shred of evidence. MY point is, that the situation at Iowa is one where worry about getting caught in scandal and doubts about AAU programs as a potential corrupting factor are very, very real on the part of the key players at Iowa.
As I said in my post, there is little reason to doubt that Forbes won't hold up well under scrutiny; his family are longtime U of Iowa staff, highly reespected and well-liked and his own past here made him a lot of friends and earned him the positive benefit of any doubt. HOWEVER, there will be scrutiny, and because that means time-consuming enquiry, his prospects of getting the Hawkeye coaching job may depend upon whether Barta has enough patience to do his job right.
Personally, my vague impressions are that Forbes seems to be one of the best of the feasible candidates for Iowa; my greater concern is not whether the search committee can find a guy who can win the right way at Iowa but whether the naif who takes the job will have a reasonable period of time to creat a stable program that can hold its own in the Big Ten.
The history of the past ten years is paradoxical: the women's basketball coach has had time to build a solid program on the cusp of consistent contendinging for BT titles; the football coach has had time to build a program where success looks like it will attract more big time prospects; Alford got much more time than his performance merited despite the scandals of his program; on the other hand, Lickliter was ousted quickly, as was the first wrestling coach after Gable stepped down, there has been a revolving door of volleyball coaches, but otherwise most of the non-revenue sports have had good coaches hired & given time without undue expectations.