I haven't seen many people saying...
Im sick of reading posts that claim "we are just IOWA"
that things cant get better than what is currently happening... maybe its the fact that everyone thinks that way that is holding Iowa back..
Why cant Iowa get to the level of Ohio St., Alabama, Texas, etc... Boise St. has come from a Juco school to a national title mentioned team almost every season...
how about everyone try getting in the mindset every season that Iowa can do it and maybe just maybe someday luck with change..
its almost a case of the lovable losers.. if you are a Cubs fan you know what I'm talking about
we CAN'T do it. Check that, I'm sure there are some people who would take that view, but I don't sense that from most fans, even KF supporters.
You ask a question about why Iowa can't get to the level of OSU, Alabama, Texas, etc. There's an explanation for that, and it will always be there no matter who the coach is. Those schools have a gargantuan advantage in regards to talent available within 250 miles of the campus. Texas literally does not have to recruit outside its home state to have the talent necessary to win a national title. Ohio State is almost in the same situation. Alabama is not in that situation, but great talent in Alabama and close proximity to the rest of the Southeast for players. Is it reasonable for us to think that Iowa SHOULD compete for a national title every year? I'm not sure that it is.
That doesn't mean we shouldn't have high expectations for the program, and in given years to have really high expectations (like this one). KF and his staff have constructed a program that allows Iowa to compete toe-to-toe with any team in the country, the fact we haven't lost a game by more than 7 points since 2007 bears that out.
Does that mean in a given instance/game that the coach shouldn't be criticized? Of course not. The end-of-game management of the clock was a fiasco, as were special teams and the mental mistake penalties (offisides on kickoff, false start on 3rd and an inch, then illegal procedure on 3rd and 5). KF deserves whatever criticism anyone wants to throw at him for any/all of those, it's ultimately on the head coach for all of those things.
But there's a difference between that and the silliness I see, questioning every aspect of the program.
Finally, to your Boise question. Boise is a great story. They (and to some extent TCU) are in a very unique position. Boise has become so much better than the rest of its league it has reduced its path to a national title to a 2-game season, on a neutral field against a decent Virginia Tech team, and a home game against a 3-3 Oregon State team. The BCS conference apologists argue (with some validity) that Boise benefits from not having to play tough opponents week after week. Could Boise go undefeated with Iowa's conference schedule? We won't ever know, but my guess is that they wouldn't. But Iowa's reality is that we have to compete with 10 other teams (soon to be 11) in our conference, which is a much different reality than Boise faces. I'm not sure it's valid to compare Iowa's situation to BSU.