We needed a spark and ...

Indeed we need a spark, some one needs to jump on a grenade (bone a fat girl).

Only sure fire way. It's science.
 
A spark like shall we say, no turnovers on our part? Whether Coker was busting huge runs or not, their defense was still accounting for him as a threat. Know what that gets ya?
 
^this. for someone reason coker is the root of all evil and mccall is super back!

you need to read the handbook on how to be a tavern hawk iowa fan.

here are some of those rules:

the best players have always been on the bench under KF.

iowa coaches are too conservative and out of touch with the modern-day athlete.

you gotta sometimes let your players be players and treat them a bit differently.

we need to blitz more - like we did v. MSU - how'd that work out?

we need to throw in young bench players when your starters aren't getting it done. see rule #1.
 
^this. for someone reason coker is the root of all evil and mccall is super back!

Agreed! The kid has 9 carries on the year against a NO BODY! We still don't know what we have there. Only speculation. Lots of head coaches on this board that don't know squat!
 
I agree it would have been nice just to see McCall in for a series. Just to change it up a bit and give Michigan State something else to think about. But I guess if he is indeed going to redshirt then no use in wasting his eligibility this season.
 
Last edited:
And alot of posters on here that if they dont agree with an idea or suggestion, instead of posting ideas or thoughts about how the game should go or what they interpeted as a successful gameplan they just say something about how this or that poster doesnt know squat... thats real
insightful!

Agreed! The kid has 9 carries on the year against a NO BODY! We still don't know what we have there. Only speculation. Lots of head coaches on this board that don't know squat!
 
Top