Watching the PTL games

deanvogs said:
LOL, changing what you said I see. You said Iowa would have to GET LUCKY to be better than 9th place. That means that you don't find any reasonable way (outside of luck) that Iowa will finish above that. Why would I give you such a sweet deal, when you said in your own words it would "take luck" to finish above 9th place. I don't think it will take luck at all, I think it is a CERTAINTY that Iowa will finish above 9th place.

So either back up your trash talk, or admit you were full of crap when you said Iowa would have to get lucky to finish above 9th place. All I've seen since that post is a bunch of back tracking, cause even you know that Iowa isn't finishing in 9th place or lower in the B1G. The only way they finish lower than 9th place is if Fran has something happen to him, and they hire you to coach them into the crapper. Since like you, I think that would take a great stroke of bad luck to happen, I will still gladly wager on what you said. Iowa will NOT FINISH ABOVE 9th PLACE IN THE B1G.
Click to expand...
Yes. They can get lucky. What don't you understand?
 


KarlChilders said:
well now it is pretty clear you are nothing but a bs troll. Going after the coach's son is bogus. You didn't hear any coach say that. You are a moron and clearly know nothing about basketball.
Click to expand...
I did no such thing. Learn to read. I'll lose a lot of sleep over what you think I didn't hear. I actually toned down 1 of the coach's opinion. I'll keep it to myself as your delicate sensibilities cannot handle it.
 


deanvogs said:
LOL, changing what you said I see. You said Iowa would have to GET LUCKY to be better than 9th place. That means that you don't find any reasonable way (outside of luck) that Iowa will finish above that. Why would I give you such a sweet deal, when you said in your own words it would "take luck" to finish above 9th place. I don't think it will take luck at all, I think it is a CERTAINTY that Iowa will finish above 9th place.

So either back up your trash talk, or admit you were full of crap when you said Iowa would have to get lucky to finish above 9th place. All I've seen since that post is a bunch of back tracking, cause even you know that Iowa isn't finishing in 9th place or lower in the B1G. The only way they finish lower than 9th place is if Fran has something happen to him, and they hire you to coach them into the crapper. Since like you, I think that would take a great stroke of bad luck to happen, I will still gladly wager on what you said. Iowa will NOT FINISH ABOVE 9th PLACE IN THE B1G.
Click to expand...
Get a proper education. Take some English and reading comprehension courses. Then we can talk about me robbing you in some bet you cannot win. Learn that there is a difference between terms like "we'll be lucky to" vs " we won't". I used 1 of those terms earlier in this thread. The other is a figment of your imagination.
 


lightning1 said:
Get a proper education. Take some English and reading comprehension courses. Then we can talk about me robbing you in some bet you cannot win. Learn that there is a difference between terms like "we'll be lucky to" vs " we won't". I used 1 of those terms earlier in this thread. The other is a figment of your imagination.
Click to expand...

Dude you need an education, it's called a bet. There is a risk in a bet, you do understand that right? If you think team X needs to "get lucky" to beat team Y, you bet team Y, every last time. If you actually thought Iowa had to "get lucky" in order to finish better than 9th place, then you would take this bet without blinking. As it is, you are a chicken plain and simple. You won't even stand behind the crap you spew on here. You have ZERO BB knowledge, and this shows it, and everyone can see it.
 












lightning1 said:
I'll be there tomorrow night. I will give you guys one stats without opinions, if you like. Only the positives.
Click to expand...

I hope Williams doesn't get his pocket picked again. If he does we're doomed for the whole year because of one player who can get a little careless with the ball in a pickup game.
 






lightning1 said:
I'll be there tomorrow night. I will give you guys one stats without opinions, if you like. Only the positives.
Click to expand...

I didn't have a problem with people not having a fully sunny disposition. Heck I'm not even considered some "sunshine pumper" by most because I have voiced my displeasure about many things. Heck I even said in this thread I have doubts about our PG position.

That all said it is your incredible Douchery that is the problem. Declaring absolutes on players like CW and Bohannon becuase of 1 PTL game, saying the team will be lucky to finish 9-10 in the B1G, ect. Basically just over the top crap that you have proven that you don't believe, or believe in so little you are unwilling to back up your statements.
 






PCHawk said:
He's my prediction to be the 2nd leading scorer this year. It's not like I'm throwing out guarantees or anything. But it is my prediction.
Click to expand...

Williams only averaged 13.8 ppg in the PTL, still think he is the second leading scorer and averages 12 ppg this year?
 


Hawk5656 said:
Williams only averaged 13.8 ppg in the PTL, still think he is the second leading scorer and averages 12 ppg this year?
Click to expand...


Yeah, i am cringing a little bit, also. To say he is going to be a double digit scorer next year, that might be asking a little bit too much. It will probably take the majority of the season to get his offensive game consistent. He will be a contributor, but I am thinking 7-9 point range, uptempo games he might dip into the 12-15 point range because of transition buckets, but this team will struggle to dictate tempo because of the lack of experience.
 


Hawk5656 said:
Williams only averaged 13.8 ppg in the PTL, still think he is the second leading scorer and averages 12 ppg this year?
Click to expand...
We don't need him to score much. We need him to value the ball and run the offense efficiently. Cook will probably end up being our second leading scorer.
 


lightning1 said:
We don't need him to score much. We need him to value the ball and run the offense efficiently. Cook will probably end up being our second leading scorer.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Williams has never been a scorer so I have no idea why some expect him to be. I think Jok, Cook, Baer and Uhl will all score more than him for sure
 


Hawk5656 said:
Agreed. Williams has never been a scorer so I have no idea why some expect him to be. I think Jok, Cook, Baer and Uhl will all score more than him for sure
Click to expand...
I'll be happy if he doesn't turn the ball over 5 or 6 times a game. He's playing out of position, so it's not really his fault.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.


Latest posts

Share this page






Top