I used to want every B1G team we played in a season to win, every B1G team we didn't play in a season to loose, against non conference schools. I wanted every higher ranked school we played in a season to beat every lower ranked school they played for the same reason. This helped w/ the computer rankings.
2009 was a great example year, our strength of schedule was way up there. At one point the teams we beat were 15 games above .500. Like KF said, "the computers haven't seen us play", which helped mitigate all of the homers voting in the polls.
Now that we have divisions and a play off game there is a chance that we could end up facing any one of the Leaders division schools in the conference championship game. I'm not sure how computers figure into the new BCS format but beating schools with winning records always looks good.
Therefore, reluctantly, I have to pull for Bucky in this one.
One thing is for sure. If the Panthers pull off a huge upset in Madison this weekend then we had better destroy them when we meet or the Hawkeyes, and the B1G, will be the whipping boys of the BCS this year.
2009 was a great example year, our strength of schedule was way up there. At one point the teams we beat were 15 games above .500. Like KF said, "the computers haven't seen us play", which helped mitigate all of the homers voting in the polls.
Now that we have divisions and a play off game there is a chance that we could end up facing any one of the Leaders division schools in the conference championship game. I'm not sure how computers figure into the new BCS format but beating schools with winning records always looks good.
Therefore, reluctantly, I have to pull for Bucky in this one.
One thing is for sure. If the Panthers pull off a huge upset in Madison this weekend then we had better destroy them when we meet or the Hawkeyes, and the B1G, will be the whipping boys of the BCS this year.