deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Great question. Based on the various replies, including mine, I think the answer for most is, "A little."
A little nonsensical? Maybe. I think it reveals how realistic and accepting most fans - even the Josh's - really are.
It's not that we expect to beat OhST (or top 5 Michigan or Penn State). When Hawks do, it's GLORIOUS, for sure! However, we absolutely, unapologetically expect to beat inferior teams - all of the time - and at least split with peer teams. Do that and you're consistently at 8-4, minimum. (I'd like to think it's more like 9-3 because I'd like to think that Iowa, with all it's resources, facilities, fan support and coaching stability is closer to an upper tier program that reloads more than rebuilds.) That's not delusional "national championship", that's just taking care of business.
The rub is once you demonstrate that level of capability, there's no excuse for such horrific regression and underperformance, ala NwU, MSU, Purdue, almost Minny, 1st 1/2 Illannoy. It occurs so frequently, so reliably, every season, that IT has become my only expectation.
That's what I lay at the feet of derKirkFer's dogmatic, inneffective strategy. That's why I have wanted him to not be Iowa's head coach for going on a dozen years.
I get this. I don't necessarily think like that myself, but everyone is different. Taking away that OSU beatdown this year would take so much joy from me I guess. While losing to Purdue sucked ballz (for me at least) Throwing a beating on OSU is more enjoyable to me than beating Purdue. So if I had to pick one to win, I'd rather beat OSU personally.