NikeHawk21
Well-Known Member
Do you think they have any effect on shooters? There was a ton of offline shots and air balls it seemed. Who knows Maryland shot awful too and they should be used to them.
Do you think they have any effect on shooters? There was a ton of offline shots and air balls it seemed. Who knows Maryland shot awful too and they should be used to them.
If the balls made any difference then Maryland would never shoot well on the road. Everyone else in the conference uses Nike balls. Jok's comment was exactly right. They are round and they bounce.
NW - also uses UA balls
UW - uses a sterling ball
I could be wrong but I believe Michigan uses a different ball, and potentially Nebby cuz they are an addidas school.
Never understood why the NCAA can't come up with one standard brand of ball everyone is required to use. Same with football for that matter. Makes no sense to have different ones. The shoe companies can still get their exposure with the Unis and other gear. No one sees the ball that close up anyway.
I have kids who play hoops and when I asked them about the UA balls they all said the balls suck. Still, it's no excuse, but there is definitely a different feel to them.
Do you think they have any effect on shooters? There was a ton of offline shots and air balls it seemed. Who knows Maryland shot awful too and they should be used to them.
Anyone who makes the argument that a different brand of ball cannot make a difference has never played the game or shot with different brands of basketballs. Just sayin' I think the Iowa players were very classy in making no excuses. Typical Mike and Mike crap twisting what was actually said. Media needs a new gene pool.
It's not an excuse... but it's interesting.....quick research.... 9 schools in the power 5 + big east use UA balls at home: BC, ND, MARYLAND, NORTHWESTERN, TTECH, UTAH, AUBURN, South Carolina, Seton Hall. Avg home losses: 2.2, and that's even with BC having 6 of them.