Top 25 for 2012-13 season...ESPN's Katz

SpiderRico said:
I have never seen a poster completely ruin an entire message board, but herby should take a bow because he has accomplished it. I can't open a single freaking post on this board without being inundated with his incoherent rants. It's absolutely ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Agree!

Herby is going to put Jon out of business.
 
SpiderRico said:
I have never seen a poster completely ruin an entire message board, but herby should take a bow because he has accomplished it. I can't open a single freaking post on this board without being inundated with his incoherent rants. It's absolutely ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Well said. The week he was gone was amazing.
 
OatesStache said:
The "totals" don't mean anything Herby. They are points per game numbers, and you can only add them up for an aggregate total if every player played in every game.

For instance, you showed (correctly) that Eric May had a 4.5 ppg average. However, Eric May did not play in all 35 games, he only played in 33 games. So if we wanted to add up the numbers the idiotic way you chose to do it, then we would have to take May's 144 points and divide it not by the 33 games he played (Which will total 4.5), but divide it by the 35 games his team played. This drops the average to 4 ppg (4.02).

Then you have to do that to the 4 other players you listed who did not play in every game.

But of course you knew that, since you're a pretend statistical analyst.

Liar.
Click to expand...

actually the stats are added up then divided by all games played the individual.
and to give you hint clueless, all the posted avg are calculated by their individual games play
so May did indeed avg 4.,272 ppg that he played in looks like we both need a refresher in basic math
just as Olaseni played 18 games and avg his 1.4 ppg, thats why its called a avg. it is also why stats can be misleading. there's no lying with stats just misleading or miscalculation of the stats, just like stats can be used to make somebody look very good you can use the stat to make that same person look very bad.
we had a saying in the Office. that Stats are for fools, liars, losers and Stock market analysists
 
ColumbusHawk said:
Agree!

Herby is going to put Jon out of business.
Click to expand...

It's absolutely ridiculous. All he does is attack people when their opinions don't line up with his, posts complete nonsense about things that don't have anything to do with the topic at hand, he pulls a single thing out of a post and continues to post on it multiple times until it has nothing to do with the original topic at hand, and then cries foul when someone calls him on his BS. How he's stuck around this long is beyond me. It really is.
 
herbyhawk said:
so which is it Iowa avg 71.9 ppg or was it less. like i said you are funny sayind one thing then saying another.
and if were not implying that a 7' would not help the defense then why post my comment about how a 7' would in one of your post where you called me a liar?
so which is it a 7' center CAN or CANNOT help the Defense. come on funny boy i can't wait for your pitiful reply
Click to expand...

The lesser number he gave in a different post is their PPG in conference games only I believe.

Are you inbred?
 
SpiderRico said:
It's absolutely ridiculous. All he does is attack people when their opinions don't line up with his, posts complete nonsense about things that don't have anything to do with the topic at hand, he pulls a single thing out of a post and continues to post on it multiple times until it has nothing to do with the original topic at hand, and then cries foul when someone calls him on his BS. How he's stuck around this long is beyond me. It really is.
Click to expand...

This post has really made me take a hard look at myself haha.:D
 
the BT standing projection or otherwise just went up in Smoke Burke declares, Sullinger gone, Nix may end up out at MSU. this puts a new spin on things.
 
Herby reminds me of a Hornet.....

gallery_10199_1828_37713.jpg


:D
 
me a hornet nope more like that annoying fly that you try to shoo then when finally find you fly swatter. is no where to found
 
Indiana won't be the best team in the country or even the conference until they start winning conference games on the road. They have been horrible on the road in conference play. They went 3-6 this year and it was a major improvement. I know they have talent but so do a lot of other teams...many of which are able to have a winning record on the road. Their 3 road wins were Penn State, Minnesota and Purdue.

Iowa had 3 road wins at Nebraska, Minnesota and Wisconsin. These wins are comparable to Indiana's road wins and I don't think anyone with any basketball knowledge will suggest Iowa had as much talent as Indiana this year.

Win 8 or all 9 at home and at least 5 on the road and it's pretty safe to assume a team will contend for the conference regular season title and is a lock for an NCAA bid. There's been a lot of conversation about how tough the Big Ten will be next year. I agree. If next season's schedule is this season's schedule reversed then these are Indiana's road games in 2013.

Ohio State
Michigan
Minnesota
Penn State
Iowa
Illinois
Northwestern
Michigan State
Purdue

Indiana will likely lose to the 3 ranked teams and probably have a tough time at Minnesota and Iowa IMO. If they start the season at #1 I don't think they will be there for long.
 
herbyhawk said:
me a hornet nope more like that annoying fly that you try to shoo then when finally find you fly swatter. is no where to found
Click to expand...

No, you're more like that stupid fly who flies right past the picnic and straight into the bug zapper. Before you die, however, you repeatedly insist that the bug zapper is not shocking you, even while your wings are on fire and your organs are melting.
 
WindsorHawk said:
Indiana won't be the best team in the country or even the conference until they start winning conference games on the road. They have been horrible on the road in conference play. They went 3-6 this year and it was a major improvement. I know they have talent but so do a lot of other teams...many of which are able to have a winning record on the road. Their 3 road wins were Penn State, Minnesota and Purdue.

Iowa had 3 road wins at Nebraska, Minnesota and Wisconsin. These wins are comparable to Indiana's road wins and I don't think anyone with any basketball knowledge will suggest Iowa had as much talent as Indiana this year.

Win 8 or all 9 at home and at least 5 on the road and it's pretty safe to assume a team will contend for the conference regular season title and is a lock for an NCAA bid. There's been a lot of conversation about how tough the Big Ten will be next year. I agree. If next season's schedule is this season's schedule reversed then these are Indiana's road games in 2013.

Ohio State
Michigan
Minnesota
Penn State
Iowa
Illinois
Northwestern
Michigan State
Purdue

Indiana will likely lose to the 3 ranked teams and probably have a tough time at Minnesota and Iowa IMO. If they start the season at #1 I don't think they will be there for long.
Click to expand...

this alone will be the reason why no team from the BT is a guarentee to be ranked #1, and will not get a #1 seed. there is to much standing in the road of any team in the BT
the BT ussually to hard venue for a team to win on the road, no matter who each team is thats playing
 
WindsorHawk said:
Indiana won't be the best team in the country or even the conference until they start winning conference games on the road. They have been horrible on the road in conference play. They went 3-6 this year and it was a major improvement. I know they have talent but so do a lot of other teams...many of which are able to have a winning record on the road. Their 3 road wins were Penn State, Minnesota and Purdue.

Iowa had 3 road wins at Nebraska, Minnesota and Wisconsin. These wins are comparable to Indiana's road wins and I don't think anyone with any basketball knowledge will suggest Iowa had as much talent as Indiana this year.

Win 8 or all 9 at home and at least 5 on the road and it's pretty safe to assume a team will contend for the conference regular season title and is a lock for an NCAA bid. There's been a lot of conversation about how tough the Big Ten will be next year. I agree. If next season's schedule is this season's schedule reversed then these are Indiana's road games in 2013.

Ohio State
Michigan
Minnesota
Penn State
Iowa
Illinois
Northwestern
Michigan State
Purdue

Indiana will likely lose to the 3 ranked teams and probably have a tough time at Minnesota and Iowa IMO. If they start the season at #1 I don't think they will be there for long.
Click to expand...
Very nice post, Windsor.....

9thQuinnWindsor02.jpg


:)
 
OatesStache said:
No, you're more like that stupid fly who flies right past the picnic and straight into the bug zapper. Before you die, however, you repeatedly insist that the bug zapper is not shocking you, even while your wings are on fire and your organs are melting.
Click to expand...

and you are the type of clown that tries to use that bug zapper unplugged
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Share this page

Top