Problem with barta if he does not make a big hire is that the fans won't come back till the team starts winning and that is going to be 2-3 years down the road.
I can think of just one name Barta could hire that would put significant people back in the stands sight unseen, and that is Bruce Pearl. Outside of that, whomever he hires is going to have to win.
I highly doubt that hiring even a proven coach like Jamie Dixon is going to translate at the boxoffice right away.
I agree with you and that is part of the problem with the Iowa program. We don't have great basketball fans or marketing office. It is all on the coach to produce a winner. I can see why it will be difficult for Barta. I just hope he does a better job of realizing what kind of personality and recruiter it will take to build the program back up.
In Lickliter's first year, the U of I's AD Budget socked $10 million in the bank. That's more than any other school I've compared so far including OSU, Florida, UT etc.Its almost a given that Barta would pay that kinda money to bring his #1 guy here. Bottom line is, you don't fire/buyout your head coach with that much money remaining on the contract if there isn't enough money in the till to payout what you need to get the guy you want. Dixon would be a HUGE hire, and 1 that could possibly save Barta's job. He hasn't had too many decisions, but the bad one of hiring Lickliter is the one we'll all remember. Sure, forcing Alford out without a buyout was ingenious, but hiring Lickliter after clouds that decision. Firing him was another good decision...we'll see what he can do this time around.
Whoa. Cheer up. You sound too depressed over something as trivial to ongoing life as a single University's basketball coach. Start every day with a smileI've resigned myself to the fact, that the new hire, is going to be some no name loser we've never heard of............sigh.........
Seriously? Dixon isn't Big Ten Mold.
GIVE ME A BREAK. Wow. The things people come up with.
Dixon would be a major addition to Iowa and would be HUGE...
I'm with you here. Similar to the Bob Huggins debate on rivals. When you're talking about Alum/Hometown/Successful being your reasons for staying, that's a big hump to get over, and money might not be enough of an incentive.He's a UW alum, almost all of his big recruits (Nate Robinson, B Roy, Abdul Gaddy) have come from the Seattle area, which is home to some of the best high school basketball talent in the country. Him leaving all of this behind to come out to Iowa, where he has no recruiting ties and where I doubt kids from the northwest are going to be real excited to come, seems extremely unlikely.
I wouldn't say Iowa doesnt have great basketball fans at all.
Iowa was Top 25 in attendance nationally 1978 through 2006....that's pretty darn good. Less than 10 programs in the nation could say that at the time.
LOSING, and three years of record losing, has sucked the joy out of it for people. Inconsistent starting times, and inconsistent days of the week have also impacted things. Iowa has great fans. And great fans want a product they feel connected to.
How connected do you feel to Iowa basketball right now? My guess is not all that much. It doesnt mean you are a bad fan, it means you just can't support what has taken place. If folks want to go when the product is poor, that is fine too. But I will never say a fan is a bad fan if they choose to do something else with their time when the product is all time poor.