I've got really good news for you. 3.7% of people who get sick enough to go to the hospital die from this, but most people have such minor symptoms they don't even know they have it.Right now, 3.7% of people who contract it, die from it. I'm guessing that would work out to be that, if you know 25 people who have Coronavirus, one would die.
If you agree that everyone is getting it, then slowing it down isn't preventing those people from dying. It's just delaying it.It will have a huge impact on the end results. It will slow down the spread and that's as important as anything at this point. Everyone's getting it, most can beat it, but some can't. If we want them to live, cancelling things that aren't necessary like sports, music etc is extremely important to SLOWING down the spread.
https://www.vox.com/2020/3/10/21171...aHg88PbLlLlFo9M0CQnzvAueo-A-BL3yxnEbJ1BMhyqL4
Didn't expect the best post in the thread to come from you. Nice work Gold.If you know 25 obese smokers with high blood pressure over 60 infected about 4 to 6 will die.
Slowing it down provides a better shot at survival. Period. We may have vaccine if we can delay the outbreak. We will have a better shot at having better and faster testing. We will have more tests. More tests= more awareness to people who have it and then they will stay away from other people. We will be able to lesson the impact on our hospitals and supplies. More people will survive by being proactive towards it spreading. That’s science. That’s what Dr’s are telling the public. I’m not smarter then drs and scientists so I’m siding with them on this one.If you agree that everyone is getting it, then slowing it down isn't preventing those people from dying. It's just delaying it.
I agree with all of that. You make it sound like if we slow it down our loved ones will live. That's not necessarily true. Both slowing it down and not slowing it down have huge consequences. It's very debatable which one is worse. It's not even a black and white answer. You have high risk people you are close to and can work from home. No brainer for you. I'm self employed and know no high risk people. No brainer for me.Slowing it down provides a better shot at survival. Period. We may have vaccine if we can delay the outbreak. We will have a better shot at having better and faster testing. We will have more tests. More tests= more awareness to people who have it and then they will stay away from other people. We will be able to lesson the impact on our hospitals and supplies. More people will survive by being proactive towards it spreading. That’s science. That’s what Dr’s are telling the public. I’m not smarter then drs and scientists so I’m siding with them on this one.
You don’t know a single high risk person? You sound like you might have lived in quarantine before the Corona.I agree with all of that. You make it sound like if we slow it down our loved ones will live. That's not necessarily true. Both slowing it down and not slowing it down have huge consequences. It's very debatable which one is worse. It's not even a black and white answer. You have high risk people you are close to and can work from home. No brainer for you. I'm self employed and know no high risk people. No brainer for me.
No one I would miss anyway.You don’t know a single high risk person? You sound like you might have lived in quarantine before the Corona.
Damn, as fair are you are with Iowa sports you’re a f’ng savage for your fellow man.No one I would miss anyway.
Didn't expect the best post in the thread to come from you. Nice work Gold.
Slowing it down provides a better shot at survival. Period. We may have vaccine if we can delay the outbreak. We will have a better shot at having better and faster testing. We will have more tests. More tests= more awareness to people who have it and then they will stay away from other people. We will be able to lesson the impact on our hospitals and supplies. More people will survive by being proactive towards it spreading. That’s science. That’s what Dr’s are telling the public. I’m not smarter then drs and scientists so I’m siding with them on this one.
You don’t know a single high risk person? You sound like you might have lived in quarantine before the Corona.
Just like I said earlier, the vaccine will be introduced several months after everything dies down (no pun intended), and they'll claim the vaccine saved us all, and all the zombies won't think twice about it.Slowing it down provides a better shot at survival. Period. We may have vaccine if we can delay the outbreak. We will have a better shot at having better and faster testing. We will have more tests. More tests= more awareness to people who have it and then they will stay away from other people. We will be able to lesson the impact on our hospitals and supplies. More people will survive by being proactive towards it spreading. That’s science. That’s what Dr’s are telling the public. I’m not smarter then drs and scientists so I’m siding with them on this one.
Didn't expect the best post in the thread to come from you. Nice work Gold.
If you know 25 obese smokers with high blood pressure over 60 infected about 4 to 6 will die.
Well, i am pretty well f*cked then.