ssckelley
Well-Known Member
Nothing if you are chairman of the Second Mile.
Our whole town is full of them then. On Friday night everyone has shirts, hats, ect supporting our school.
Nothing if you are chairman of the Second Mile.
Our whole town is full of them then. On Friday night everyone has shirts, hats, ect supporting our school.
Ok but somebody's going to have to pay. At this point, I just know it will end up being us. Most of you (I'm 80) don't remember the first days of cable TV. When had anyone ever had to PAY for TV? It came free to your aerial (SP?) on your roof! Seemed ridiculous! But eventually, I visited friends who had been dumb enough to waste their money on this stuff, and realized I was missing a lot of what I wanted to see. So I bit the bullet,& bought cable. My current problem is that my cable company doesn't have some of the netwooks/programs I want. I'm willing to pay more for them, but they tell me lot's dont. Any suggestions?
No shiny stadium will get people to go to Northwestern games. Wrigley is a dump but it sells out.
And um, can I get a show of hands here who wears high school gear? **Keeps hand down**
Cable companies are a lot less than 20 years away from being obsolete. 4G is amazing but with technology like Google Fiber (700mbps not a typo) on the horizon and algebra increasing wireless internet speeds by 1000% (LINK) The internet will take over all media and you will not need a cellular data plan to do it. I think that Wireless internet for rural (FCC) and Google Fiber will make it so depending on the current way of how we get our programming will have negative consequences sooner than you think.
I also do not have cable and have watched every Football and Basketball game this season. If cable companies wanted me to pay them they would offer me an online subscription deal with out having to subscribe to their infomercials.
Yeah, no kidding. And about 2% of them are football fans. The rest are hipsters who moved to Brooklyn. You see, when you call Mediacom and say "Give me Big Ten Network" you're getting some gal from Iowa who will politely read a "I'm sorry to hear about your frustration, sir, and I will forward your concern to management" song and dance for you. And when 30 people cancel and tell Mediacom it is because of BTN they will say "Oh crap, we just lost 3% of our customers." Have you ever dealt with TWC in NYC? These are people who got rejected from Post Office and DMV jobs. Correction, Staten Islanders and NJ people who got rejected from Post Office and DMV jobs. The first time the 23 Rutgers fans who live in NYC call up and demand TWC to play ball, they will be met with a degree of hostility they have never encountered.
Rutgers
A New York Times study of the 210 television markets found New York has about 3 million college football fans, and 20.9 percent of those chose Rutgers as their favorite team. That’s almost equal to those naming Notre Dame (9.2 percent), Penn State (6.4) and UConn (5.2) combined.
Obviously saying someone is your favorite does not equate to spending additional jack to watch them on a Saturday in NYC; but I do think between the Rutgers fans willing to pay for viewership and the Midwest transplants that actually care about college football, bringing Rutgers to the fold is a good move. I've never lived in NYC, so I certainly could be wrong. Good discussion, though.
Rutgers
A New York Times study of the 210 television markets found New York has about 3 million college football fans, and 20.9 percent of those chose Rutgers as their favorite team. That’s almost equal to those naming Notre Dame (9.2 percent), Penn State (6.4) and UConn (5.2) combined.
Obviously saying someone is your favorite does not equate to spending additional jack to watch them on a Saturday in NYC; but I do think between the Rutgers fans willing to pay for viewership and the Midwest transplants that actually care about college football, bringing Rutgers to the fold is a good move. I've never lived in NYC, so I certainly could be wrong. Good discussion, though.
That article did not show the rest of the chart of the NYC market, Michigan has 5% and Ohio State has 2.2%.
So Rutgers alone probably would not deliver the NYC market but the combination of Rutgers, Penn State, Michigan, and Ohio State gives the Big Ten 1/3rd (over 1 million viewers) that would potentially want BTN. The challenge for the BTN is that it only represents 5% of the total market since (going back to ok4p point) only a small percentage of the total market cares about college football. But 5% of 20 million is still a pretty big number, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Here is a good article on the subject: The Geography of College Football Fans (and Realignment Chaos) - NYTimes.com
From that article it is easy to see why Georgia Tech would be considered if the B1G ever looks to expand again. Contrary to the belief NFL cities do not care about college football Atlanta has 41% of the population that follow college football.
mean while the rest of the world is laughing at what we have in the US for "internet speed" and paying considerably less.Interesting thoughts.
What about this; the majority of cable subs migrate to a satellite platform, like DirecTV...and those Sat companies take advantage of the advances in wireless internet speeds (4G speeds on cell phones are already faster than half of the internet connections in US)...doesn't the source of money just shift to a different provider?
mean while the rest of the world is laughing at what we have in the US for "internet speed" and paying considerably less.