I think they said during the broadcast that he and the other safety were both filling in for injured starters.#4 from MN had a rough film session yesterday.
I think they said during the broadcast that he and the other safety were both filling in for injured starters.#4 from MN had a rough film session yesterday.
As a team, I agree. I was referring specifically to the offensive skill players, who are still adjusting to a new system with a QB that hasn't had hardly any meaningful snaps in two years.
That said, I'm not giving any kind of pass to the OL. There are no excuses for the players or Barnett this season. Zero. Thus far, I would say we have seen improvement in run blocking, albeit inconsistent. Technique in pass-pro has been terrible at times, especially along the interior. There's no excuse for getting overpowered physically over and over at this point. Barnett has had more than enough time to get these players prepared physically and mentally.
YupI will be the bad guy in this thread. Given the current state of o-line play in general, this o-line is good and Barnett deserves credit for that. This o-line is 2015 good except CJB was much better than CM. Shedeur Sanders would kill to have the Iowa o-line right now.
Iowa is basically rolling out 5 guards as their o-line, which 95% of Power 4 teams and 90% of NFL teams are doing. There are only so many 320 lbs. humans with the athleticism to do this. You guys are nitpicking over bullshit. Is the pass protection perfect? No. Gawd forbid you get a quarterback that can make a play with his arm or legs or maybe both.
Is the line better than the last two seasons? Absolutely. The point is they should be better - meaning that health and experience by itself was destined to translate into better play (ideally). Improvement was bound to happen organically, regardless of the coach.I will be the bad guy in this thread. Given the current state of o-line play in general, this o-line is good and Barnett deserves credit for that. This o-line is 2015 good except CJB was much better than CM. Shedeur Sanders would kill to have the Iowa o-line right now.
Iowa is basically rolling out 5 guards as their o-line, which 95% of Power 4 teams and 90% of NFL teams are doing. There are only so many 320 lbs. humans with the athleticism to do this. You guys are nitpicking over bullshit. Is the pass protection perfect? No. Gawd forbid you get a quarterback that can make a play with his arm or legs or maybe both.
Is the line better than the last two seasons? Absolutely. The point is they should be better - meaning that health and experience by itself was destined to translate into better play (ideally). Improvement was bound to happen organically, regardless of the coach.
Don't misunderstand, I'm not hating on the line or the players. Just pointing out that fundamental errors are still happening primarily in pass-pro, which have nothing to do with scheme, and reflect on coaching. Fans are jumping all over McNamara. I get it, but no quarterback is going to have a great stat line when an interior defensive lineman is immediately in his face over and over.
McNamara definitely has his faults, and honestly hasn't shown much, but we have to remember the quarterback doesn't play in a vacuum - Protection, route running, reads in RPO, etc., are all factors in his play. He may well end up not being the answer, but there's a lot to take into account before the torches and pitchforks come out.
Normally his statement about that would make me feel better because it would mean the QB's at risk of being benched for a new approach, whether temporarily or permanently, but I won't necessarily put too much stock into it until I see a change.And, as KF made clear, we must get going on passing the football.
I gotta push back on some of this. While firing his son was not his idea, he went outside his normal circle and hired a guy he had no real relationship with, and from what I have observed, has let him implement his system and run it the way that he wants to. This offense looks nothing like BF's offense, both in scheme and performance (and for the most part, its the same players). He could have elevated Budmyr and told him to run BF's offense better. He didn't, so there is some change there.Normally his statement about that would make me feel better because it would mean the QB's at risk of being benched for a new approach, whether temporarily or permanently, but I won't necessarily put too much stock into it until I see a change.
One thing I don't think gets considered enough is that a major depth chart shakeup, particularly at QB is basically a public admission that you were wrong in your choice of leader for the team. KF seems to hate doing that which I understand...it's not a pleasant thing to admit you missed on someone who was so highly touted. Same thing with an offensive philosophy. Letting Lester have the keys to the car and do things totally different than what's been done the past decade (and produced terrible offensive performances) isn't something KF is willing to do at this point, and I do believe some of that is a get off my lawn, I know what's best type of thing.
And just to spread the load around a little, I've felt the same way in the past about Phil never blitzing, especially as college football has moved away from the run game. But the difference is no matter what he does, Phil has had a ton of success to this point. I think that's the difference. KF is certainly no dummy, but I think each year that passes he gets less and less willing to try new things and admit what he does (on the offensive side) doesn't work well.
Is the line better than the last two seasons? Absolutely. The point is they should be better - meaning that health and experience by itself was destined to translate into better play (ideally). Improvement was bound to happen organically, regardless of the coach.
Don't misunderstand, I'm not hating on the line or the players. Just pointing out that fundamental errors are still happening primarily in pass-pro, which have nothing to do with scheme, and reflect on coaching. Fans are jumping all over McNamara. I get it, but no quarterback is going to have a great stat line when an interior defensive lineman is immediately in his face over and over.
McNamara definitely has his faults, and honestly hasn't shown much, but we have to remember the quarterback doesn't play in a vacuum - Protection, route running, reads in RPO, etc., are all factors in his play. He may well end up not being the answer, but there's a lot to take into account before the torches and pitchforks come out.
Agree. Sometimes the defense just has the right scheme and play-call at the right time. Very hard to hold that against the line or backs. That kind of situation is just going to happen occasionally.This play is illustrative of the problems:
Iowa at Minnesota | Highlights | Big Ten Football | 09/21/2024
00:00:00 - 1st Quarter00:00:56 - 2nd Quarter00:01:52 - 3rd Quarter00:02:31 - 4th Quarter#B1GFootball #iowahawkeyes #minnesotagoldengophers #bigtenfootball Wa...youtu.be
MN has 4 guys in threatening positions to the offense's left, so presumably we shift protection in that direction (OL fans that way, RB is on that side). Two of those guys back out, and a blitzer comes from the right. So, now there are 3 rushers coming from the right, and we only have 1 guy over there (OG is looking left, and RB has to come all the way across).
I don't know enough about football to know if this is just a case where you tip your cap to the D for a good disguise, if the scheme was flawed, or if Colby needed to do a better job of thinking on his feet. Whatever happened, having one guy blocking 3 rushers is not a winning formula.