How about this, I'd say it's about 1000x more likely that Ricky sucks it up early and gets replaced by Vandenberg next year than it is that he has an NFL career like Tom Brady, Kurt Warner or Joe Montana.
Again, no one is saying that he's going to have a HOF career. But there are people (like Ghost) who don't think he's even a candidate to make it in the NFL, much less be drafted. That's just ignorant. If guys can have a HOF career with similar physical tools (however rare it is), then it's at least a decent chance that he can make it as an NFL QB. Chad Pennington had similar skills as far as arm strength and accuracy, and he wasn't that bad. Not HOF, but not bad.
You're calling me ignorant? Seriously? And then you go on to say that Pennington and Stanzi have similar accuracy?
Pennington has the best completion percentage in NFL history. Pennington and Stanzi's games have seriously nothing in common.
I will no longer waste time discussing this with you, since you clearly have no freaking idea what you're talking about.
Yes, McCoy is a good example. Guess what? He was a Heisman candidate and if he would have looked reasonably decent against Nebby, he would have won. Do you realize you just made my point for me? By your logic Iowa just needs to keep 13 more drives going throughout the entire 2010 season, just over one a game, and Stanzi just has to throw 3 less picks to be a candidate.
There is a possibility that Stanzi will invent a cream cheese which is low in calories yet still tastes delicious. That is not a reason to discuss it.
The arm strength is THAT big of an issue. Pennington had a weak arm, but could read a defense in his sleep. Ricky does not have that talent. 99% of QBs can't read a d like Pennington, which is why he was . Like I said before, Ricky's trouble in reading a defense only exascerbates his arm strength issues.
The point I was trying to make, which I guess I didn't hit on well, is that the only reason McCoy was a Heisman finalist is because of his name.
There were QBs who put up bigger numbers such as Tony Pike (29/6 on a BCS team) or Jimmy Clausen (3,700 yds!/28/4), but because they were not named Colt McCoy, they didn't have a chance.
Let just say that the Hawks put together a very good year and win another BCS bowl game, Stanzi cuts down on his turnovers and is in Heisman contention at the end of the year and possibly wins it. What does everyone think his draft stock will be?
at this point, who cares what he does in the NFL. i'm focused on glendale or pasadena
Both of them have considerably stronger arms than Stanzi. Not to mention they're two of the most accurate passers in the history of the NFL, read defenses better and don't telegraph their throws.
Does Stanzi have at least some shot at making it in the NFL? Sure. I admitted as much by saying that he could be a 4th round pick next year earlier in this thread. But the comparisons to Brady, Warner and Montana just need to stop.
Please don't talk down to me and resort to using caps lock. I watch a ton of football. Maybe Stanzi has as strong of an arm as Warner. MAYBE. Tough to tell since Warner is throwing against NFL DBs and into smaller windows. Not to mention that he's now freaking 38 years old. His arm was stronger when he was younger. Brady's arm is considerably stronger. There is no doubt about this. He can throw it 70+ on the fly in the game.You think when I said that Warner, Brady, (oh and by the way let me also throw in a guy named Drew Brees) didn't have great arms that I was saying that Stanzi is going to be as good as those guys? Could I possibly just be saying that those guys making it proves that you don't have to have a rocket arm to make it in the NFL?
Could it be possible I wrote a nuanced response to this topic and didn't actually literally mean that he was going to be as good as those guys?
I DIDN'T SAY HE WAS GOING TO BE AS GOOD AS THOSE GUYS JUST THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A ROCKET ARM TO MAKE IT INTO THE NFL!
Oh, and by the way, those guys don't have "considerably stronger arms than those guys". Do you even watch football?
Please don't talk down to me and resort to using caps lock. I watch a ton of football. Maybe Stanzi has as strong of an arm as Warner. MAYBE. Tough to tell since Warner is throwing against NFL DBs and into smaller windows. Not to mention that he's now freaking 38 years old. His arm was stronger when he was younger. Brady's arm is considerably stronger. There is no doubt about this. He can throw it 70+ on the fly in the game.
On those notes, I'm done talking about this. I like Stanzi as a QB and am tired of having to break down his game in this thread. I hope he's extremely successful this year and leads the Hawks to an undefeated season and National Championship. The comparisons people made in here are completely maddening though (Warner, Brady, Montana and now Brees fellas?). I just couldn't let them go.
Please don't talk down to me and resort to using caps lock. I watch a ton of football. Maybe Stanzi has as strong of an arm as Warner. MAYBE. Tough to tell since Warner is throwing against NFL DBs and into smaller windows. Not to mention that he's now freaking 38 years old. His arm was stronger when he was younger. Brady's arm is considerably stronger. There is no doubt about this. He can throw it 70+ on the fly in the game.
On those notes, I'm done talking about this. I like Stanzi as a QB and am tired of having to break down his game in this thread. I hope he's extremely successful this year and leads the Hawks to an undefeated season and National Championship. The comparisons people made in here are completely maddening though (Warner, Brady, Montana and now Brees fellas?). I just couldn't let them go.