Stanzi to start against Colts?

I also just read that Romeo and Pioli have been told they will be fired at the end of the season, so maybe that changes something??
 
Stanzi, will likely, when he gets his shot, rival the success Tom Brady is currently having. Don't be suprised if the real American hero wins 2-3 super bowls, when he gets his shot.
 
SamsonHawk515 said:
Stanzi, will likely, when he gets his shot, rival the success Tom Brady is currently having. Don't be suprised if the real American hero wins 2-3 super bowls, when he gets his shot.
Click to expand...

Yeah he could be on the worst team in the league and take them straight to the Super...oh wait.
 
H8IAST8 said:
I also just read that Romeo and Pioli have been told they will be fired at the end of the season, so maybe that changes something??
Click to expand...

Remember last year when Todd Haley purposely DIDN'T play Stanzi because he was TRYING to get fired?
 
H8IAST8 said:
Brady Quinn named the starter
Click to expand...

Crennel's worse fear is that Stanzi comes in and kills it, making Crennel out to be a bigger dimrod than people already perceive him to be for not playing him sooner. So there Ricky stays on the sidelines, rusting away.
 
20120827_kkt_sm8_406.0_standard_730.0.jpg



What's with the female golfer look anyway? You can't lead men in to battle with this look, Rick.
 
DwayneTwill said:
Remember last year when Todd Haley purposely DIDN'T play Stanzi because he was TRYING to get fired?
Click to expand...

No, he purposely didn't play Stanzi because he wanted to **** Pioli off. Maybe in a round a bout way that is wanting to get fired. But, according to the media here in KC, Pioli wanted Stanzi to play.
 
homes said:
Crennel's worse fear is that Stanzi comes in and kills it, making Crennel out to be a bigger dimrod than people already perceive him to be for not playing him sooner. So there Ricky stays on the sidelines, rusting away.
Click to expand...

Hahahahaha. Yeah.

Oh, you were serious?
 
ForeverHawk said:
No, he purposely didn't play Stanzi because he wanted to **** Pioli off. Maybe in a round a bout way that is wanting to get fired. But, according to the media here in KC, Pioli wanted Stanzi to play.
Click to expand...

Of course Pioli wanted him to play. He's stupid.
 
ForeverHawk said:
I think his overall record as a starter and his bowl record speak for themselves? His QB rating his senior year was the best of any QB in Hawkeye history. In fact, as bad as he allegedly was his sophomore and junior years, his all time QB rating is ranked only behind Chuck Long, Chuck Hartlieb and Brad Banks. If I remember correctly, two of those were Heisman candidates, right? Yes, Stanzi was a Hawkeye great at the QB position. He deserves a shot in the NFL and I hope he gets it come Saturday. Even if he never makes it, he earned his shot in the NFL, regardless of how long it may or may not last.
Click to expand...

Take your QB rating stat and just throw it out as it really doesn't mean anything, especially when you compare the Chucks against Stanzi, way too many rules changes to compare about three decades. I would hope that most QB's have better ratings than players that played that long ago as when a DB looks at a WR cross-eyed he will get flagged for PI.

Do you really think there is any comparison to Banks and Stanzi, really think about that for a minute before you answer, it isn't an easy or hard question. If you want to take Stanzi's four years over Banks' one, I will let you. It is a shame Banks was about 4'11" or he would have gotten a real look in the NFL, oh well, it is what it is.

With Stanzi, you had the dramatic and that is great, but realistically, I would take guys like Matt Rodgers and Mark Vlasic over Stanzi any day. He is a better version of Nathan Chandler, the difference you ask, less head scratching INT's.
 
sportstalent said:
Take your QB rating stat and just throw it out as it really doesn't mean anything, especially when you compare the Chucks against Stanzi, way too many rules changes to compare about three decades. I would hope that most QB's have better ratings than players that played that long ago as when a DB looks at a WR cross-eyed he will get flagged for PI.

Do you really think there is any comparison to Banks and Stanzi, really think about that for a minute before you answer, it isn't an easy or hard question. If you want to take Stanzi's four years over Banks' one, I will let you. It is a shame Banks was about 4'11" or he would have gotten a real look in the NFL, oh well, it is what it is.

With Stanzi, you had the dramatic and that is great, but realistically, I would take guys like Matt Rodgers and Mark Vlasic over Stanzi any day. He is a better version of Nathan Chandler, the difference you ask, less head scratching INT's.
Click to expand...

From an NFL career statistic standpoint, Vlasic was the best Iowa QB ever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Share this page

Top