Crawford's Glove is ICE Cold....Game 4 is a fast breakathon. Constant movement with great passing and puck handling.
there have been some wicked hard shots and the goalies are lucky it is not 7-7 with 6 minutes to go.
Not a lot of icing and play stoppage.
If the hawks lose this after several leads they are really hurting. Crawford needs to shade to his glove side and make boston shot to stick side as almost every goal is at his glove, all 5 this game.
There really has been some good defense considering how fast the play is and how quickly they reverse the action.
Good to see prime time hockey again.
Boston has seemed to crack the code on Crawford (go high, glove-side). Could get ugly for the Blackhawks if they're not careful.
Did you watch the game? If so than you know that the Blackhawks had to work harder for their goals than the Bruins. If your an NHL goalie you have to stop the pucks that are visible from stick to net outside 20ft. On almost all of the goals Crawford had great visibility on the puck but his glove wasn't quick enough. Notice that if Rask can see the puck, the puck isn't going in (Game 3). But if you get people in front of the net you can get goals on Rask. Not the case with Crawford. Shoot the puck over the glove and you got a good chance at a goal no matter who is in front of him.I love how the day after the Blackhawks won Crawford is the goalie people say needs to step it up or else. Deadspin included in the pilig on. No mention of Rask who gave up 6 goals...
Anyone think maybe the Blackhawks finally cracked the Rask riddle and play the way that best suits them? They finally played their style of game an controlled the whole game.
Did you watch the game? If so than you know that the Blackhawks had to work harder for their goals than the Bruins. If your an NHL goalie you have to stop the pucks that are visible from stick to net outside 20ft. On almost all of the goals Crawford had great visibility on the puck but his glove wasn't quick enough. Notice that if Rask can see the puck, the puck isn't going in (Game 3). But if you get people in front of the net you can get goals on Rask. Not the case with Crawford. Shoot the puck over the glove and you got a good chance at a goal no matter who is in front of him.
I have watched them all season and most Blackhawks fans already knew his glove was his weakest part. And throw in he has a tendency to let in goals that have no business of scoring.
Hawks win!
Rask reminds me a lot of Roberto Longo against the Hawks. Stops the first shot regardless of difficulty, but gives big rebounds which Chicago is able to score on.
Not sure how the Hawks are winning. They seem to let the BB's skate free in front of the goal just waiting to deflect a shot into the goal. Also, Boston has better control of the puck in most cases. Finally, it appeared the BHawks were quicker to the puck than they have been and had great speed with it when they were in front of the defender.