Does anybody else remember Hayden Fry giving the 2nd string QB at least one series a game, usually sometime in the 3rd Q depending on the game situation. Am I just dreaming this? I don't think it is a bad idea and wonder if would be beneficial to do this for a few reasons.
1) Obviously give the back-up some experience and a chance to play each game. Get some experience in real game situations building confidence. Maybe keeping the backup appeased so would not transfer this day in age.
2) Maybe push the starting QB a bit if knew someone behind him getting a little playing time.
3) Build back-ups confidence for when does take over or have to lead the team in case of an injury. Not so much of a shell shock.
It wouldn't be a "dual QB" situation but just a series (or two if plays well) a game. I think Hayden always did it consistently in the 3rd Q so everyone knew when it was and the back-up QB was mentally ready. Of course, game situation plays into it and a coach wouldn't put in a bad situation such as backed up on the 1 yrd line or depending on how close the score is. If the Hawks were winning something like 24-7, would it be bad to give the back-up QB a series? Might be more beneficial in the end, and again, let that player know you are invested in him and getting him some playing time. Of course you think about turnovers but these are Div 1 college QB's, so they should be able to handle it and the team shouldn't miss much for a series. Also, maybe this back-up proves to have the hot hand that game and can lead the team to the end. Who knows.
I think if your team is up a few scores or by a comfortable margin or down a couple scores, it's worth doing. Again, benefit in the long run.
Yes, you are dreaming it. In blow-outs, yes, backup QBs, as well as other positions, saw reps. It wasn't done systematically, though. Anyone who tells you it was didn't see any Hawk games coached by Hayden Fry.
But, I think teams will need to start doing it. Players, especially QBs, are starting to leave/transfer on a whim. If they see no light at the end of the tunnel when it comes to playing time, we will start to see QBs "shutting it down" after game four. Some teams have enough depth to go with their 3rd-string QB in a pinch. Most teams do not, though.
Look at Clemson. They just announced the freshman phenom is starting. Swinney even admitted the started, Bryant, had "done nothing wrong". So what is Bryant doing? He missed practice yesterday, and it appears he is shutting it down for this season and redshirting/transferring. IF something happens to the starter, you'll have a hard time convincing a guy to come back in game six, or game eight, or especially game ten or later. I'm not so sure we won't see the same thing from Jalen Hurts at Alabama. If we don't see him in Game 5, my guess is Saban will have to come clean with the media. Now with legalized gambling, Pulling An Urban won't cut it, either with media OR with gambling "folks" (ahem).
Hell, look at Nebraska. When Martinez went down, they not only had no experienced backup, but the one that had gotten beaten out for starter was already at another school. So much for depth.