I don't recall a single screen play. Inexcusable when you have a defense blitzing every other play.
I do rewatch the game
I don't recall a single screen play. Inexcusable when you have a defense blitzing every other play.
They got beat by a better team yesterday, vs Oklahoma in 2011, v LSU in 2013, v Texas in 2006. 2002, that one was a bowl prep issue and one Kirk acknowledged.
They were 29 points better yesterday. Are they That much better, no, but they likely beat Iowa 8 times out of ten and probably by more than 10 a few times.
It's cliche and made fun of because it's a Kirkcism, but ebbs/flows is real. It's the same reason a team we beat by 30 beat the team that beat us by 29. It sucks, but it happens.
Ferentz is paid 4 mil a year for that exact stuff not to happen. Losing is one thing but that is just unacceptable
I do rewatch the game
This exactly. If he's paid to not get blown out then he certainly deserves a pay increase.Oh my Godd. He makes how much? Wow, hadn't heard that. Never been mentioned here.
So, he's paid that much, not to win, but to not get blown out? You know, cause losing is one thing and totally acceptable.
JFC, get a new mantra. Or get over it.
I actually thought Iowa was a year ahead of schedule. Iowa is loaded next year
Just an utter embarrassment, the was zero semblance of any game plan whatsoever. Did Ferentz realize mccaffery was the best player in the country and maybe you should try to keep the ball away from him. Stanfords defense knew exactly what was coming, no shots downfield, no screens passes, why attempt to keep them honest. It's like Ferentz got back in the good graces of hawk fans and mailed in the Rose bowl like he did the previous 5 seasons after 10 yr contract extension. I'm just sick for those fans that went out there, all that money and the worst experience imaginable. Firing is not extreme imo, but this debacle warrants no extension. Completely different team that went 12-1. Shameful bowl performances in the last 4 outings.
Ok Stanford is good, but they aren't 35-0 good over Iowa. That performance and the 3 previous bowl games shouldn't be acceptable. Vegas favored Stanford by 6.5, Iowa was extremely unprepared and that trend has remained over the last 4 bowl games.
Please don't feed this Cyclone troll. I was at the game. It was a tremendous thrill. This was a championship team and one I will never forget. Sometimes you simply run up against a better team. That was the case against Stanford.
Well done Hawks....and this OP troll can shove it
Yes we were overrated.
No they werent. They had an awful day where they cant play any worse and Stanford had a day where they cant play any better. It happens
Yes they were WAY over rated...even a great day Stanford beats Iowa by 2 + scores.
Yes they were WAY over rated...even a great day Stanford beats Iowa by 2 + scores.