Motigerhawk
Well-Known Member
I think that you open it up in some fashion.
It's pretty much a personal choice. It's a choice for each states government, each college and ultimately each person if they want to attend.
I've thought about this quite a bit and while the answers are not exactly easy, I keep coming back to the fact that people have choices and that is life. I mean if you want to go spend the night with 3 hookers in Vegas, that is your choice, but you accept the risk. You want to drive 120 mph, that's your choice, but you accept the risk. If spicy food doesn't agree with you and you choose to eat it....,...
Maybe it's actually a good thing and gives people a sense of taking responsibility for themselves?
In the end I think you open it up, because if you don't, there is going to be watch parties. So you can have 30 or more people all sitting in the same room of a bar or something and if one is infected and sneezes, the atomized saliva will stay airborne for a long time with the air movement of just people moving around. So the case then seems to point to is sitting outside with 30 people around you safer than inside with 30 people sitting around you? I would say outside is definitely safer.
Now that said, I think that safety margin starts to go down when you factor in tailgating and even sitting in the train. So if you tried to somewhat chill on huge groups of tailgating and kept them groups smaller and wore a n95 mask if you had to ride the train, I would say your odds of catching it are about the same as going to a indoor bar/restaurant and watching the game. Possibly even lower. Or at least close enough that it is negligible.
(Besides they hand out hawk towels at the gate. You would think if someone were going to cough or sneeze even without this whole covid thing, they would be smart enough to do so into the towel. Just saying)
Good post. Some of your points are valid about personal choice, i.e. the hooker in Vegas, that will not harm anyone but yourself. But the driving 120 mph down the highway does put others in jeopardy and that is where I am with this. Sure you can do what you want. That is what this country is basically about. I get the idea of doing what you want. But when it puts others at risk, I feel there should be limitations. Not forever, but until we get a handle on this.
Right now, health care professionals are really POed about the opening up. They see what is going on 1st hand, and if they think this is a bad idea, who am I to argue?
I want Iowa football and I want my daughters to go back to college and my younger experience her 1st year on campus. But if another 100k plus die, is it worth it? I think that is what it ultimately comes down to, what is the price that you are willing pay?