I have pretty much given up on trying to figure out where I stand on this business of commitments that are not really commitments. I get annoyed with the kids who commit after getting a solid offer from a university then back out of their decision. And, I get absolutely furious with the university that commits to a kid and then backs out when an injury occurs or worse yet, when a better recruit comes along. I hate it that young kids are under so much pressure to make a decision, although if they have mature adults in their corner at home, the adults should be the ones to deal with the pressure. I feel bad for coaches whose very jobs are on the line when they are counting on 16 and 17 year olds to stay true to their commitments, and then perform admirably on the field when they arrive at their destination. Who wants that job? Then, when a recruit backs out of a commitment, or does not perform to expectations after s/he signs, or if they transfer, we can come to Hawkeye Nation, or a million other sites, and blast the coaches for being inept in their ability to recruit, develop players, keep them in the fold for four or five years, and win lots of football games.
Now, how about some words of wisdom so that I may find some comfort in how this system works...
