Robowe
Well-Known Member
Good idea. Wonder why it hasn't been implemented - not permitted?
Not sure on that.
Good idea. Wonder why it hasn't been implemented - not permitted?
Gopher fans Hate for Iowa never ceases to amaze me. Now, it has apparently permeated into the security crew. They are all suffering from Iowa Derangement Syndrome.Evidently Iowa fans aren't allowed to cheer at the Barn...
Stupid rule.Totally agree. I think that was the original intent of the play.
Coaches can't call timeout while the ball is in play. That rule changed a while back. But, as PCHawk has mentioned, Baer was signialing for a timeout, but it was not granted.
Totally agree. I think that was the original intent of the play.
Coaches can't call timeout while the ball is in play. That rule changed a while back. But, as PCHawk has mentioned, Baer was signialing for a timeout, but it was not granted.
Evidently Iowa fans aren't allowed to cheer at the Barn...
After Tate in 08, the next one was Marble against Tennessee. It wasn't a buzzer beater tho and we lost in ot anyway. After that it was Uthoff against Minnesota. I think that one there was a couple seconds left and if Im not mistaken that's the game where Minnesota made a layup that got waved off. That one we were tied and the shot prevented overtime. After that, Uthoff made one against Northwestern that forced ot but we lost anyway. Then there was the Temple tip in. The last time we made a shot in a win or lose situation was Tate in 08. Before that was probably Recker in the tourney. That's means one in 15 years or so. Crazy.
I honestly don't know if they coaches were aware or if a player told them, or if coaches can even tell them to go to the monitor. It seems like I've seen coaches complain to refs in the past and they go to the monitor, but I don't know the official rule.Do we know they didn't ask refs to look at it? Further, I don't see how the coaching staff would be able to tell from where they were that the Minnesota guy was out of bounds - there's no way they could see from that far away plus the fact that there were players blocking their view. Shoot, even the players on the court didn't say anything, either, and they were the ones closest to the action. Is there a rule that doesn't allow the ref to review when a timeout is called vis a vis when a jump ball is called, such that asking a ref to review whether a timeout was "timely" called is not a reviewable issue. Perhaps it wasn't reviewed because the issue at that moment was the timeout and not the out of bounds. The out of bounds element of the play was something the viewers knew about, but I don't see how the coaches could have been aware of it - it was a bang-bang play that was likely not something they could have seen. And, unlike football, they don't have coaches in a press box that can call down to the coaching staff to ask for a review.
Yes it's a carry, probably 1 of 10 that occurs in any game not called. What is left out is the absolutely horrible defensive posture.
What's funny is, Williams did a good job on Mason on this possession. It was a smart substitution by Fran (Williams for Bohannon).
But it is terrible defensive posture at that moment. Williams played very small school high school basketball and was faster than most everyone else. At this level, no.
Why couldn't replay review that?
Fran and staff should've asked but they were too busy freaking out about the horrible no timeout call. If they would've realized that the MN player was also out of bounds, I think it could've been reviewed.
I think I said somewhere in this thread that I don't know if it could've been reviewed. I looked it up and it appears that you can only review a ball that is tipped. So if you are standing out of bounds touching the ball and the refs missed it, too bad. So I openly admit I that the above post was bad work out of me.Just curious.... why do you think it could have been reviewed??