He hasnt? Did i dream he coached at WVU?
Rich Rod has proven he can win and win big. I hate the guy but it doesnt change the fact he was great at WVU. This will be a fun discussion after this season...Michigan will be solid in 2010.
Except that he has done NOTHING at Michigan but create serious unrest in the fanbase, due to both his inability to win and his propensity for bringing trouble from the NCAA. By your logic, Tom Osborne could come to Indiana and automatically be the best coach in the conference (I mean, look at what he did at Nebraska). What Rodriguez did at WVU is irrelevant. He hasn't done squat in Ann Arbor, therefore thoroughly deserves to be ranked in the bottom tier of coaches. Lloyd Carr won the CapOne Bowl in his last year, and Michigan has not done anything since.
Ferentz would be my #1, but Tressel is a VERY close 2nd. There are only three coaches in the country who I would even consider wanting over Ferentz: Tressel, Saban, and a younger JoePa.
Ferentz (obvious choice)
Tressel (really no different than Ferentz, only he gets OSU talent. And the record speaks for itself)
JoePa (do I really have to explain this one?)
Fitzgerald (he's actually building a case for "more with less" title. NW has even less than we do, yet he wins)
Bielema (needs to string together another couple 9-10 wins seasons to start being
considered one of the best in the country)
Hope (I really like what he's already gotten started in WL)
Dantonio (he could be higher, but his teams have yet to get past the MSU S.O.P. of underachieving, so no dice)
Lynch (another coach that I really like, he's just toiling with not enough talent on both sides of the ball. Offensively they're dangerous, but guys need to step up defensively for them to be truly competitive)
RichRod (he's got to show me something besides a win over a weak ND team)
Brewster (I liked him a couple years ago, but the general lack of improvement and continued dependence on Decker has caused his luster to wear away, IMO)
Zook (but please don't go anywhere)