NCHawker
Well-Known Member
I know, I know....this has been hashed and re-hashed many times on this board.
I'm 61, been an astute Hawkeye watcher, etc for 5+ decades...i.e. I'm not some wild-eyed kid acting on emotion.
But for the life of me, I don't see how one can argue against the rationalization that the longer an Iowa QB (under the current coaching staff(s)) is in the system, the worse they perform.
I'm not talking about stats, which pile up naturally with more starts. I'm talking about game management, picking up defenses, making smart choices...not repeating errors over and over they made earlier in their career, etc...fill in the blank.
Stanley is the quintessential example of this. He isn't playing any better now than he did three years ago.
My theory is there is a pretty big blanket thrown on the QBs regarding what and what not to do and it ends up being suffocating.
Thoughts?
not enough rationale there to support the claim that he is worse.
I'll add that most of us don't know enough about formations and decisions that Nate makes prior to the snap. We all need to learn the game. I'm just too lazy to do it.