100% satisfied with Hulu live.Well the season is over and many of use have used streaming service. Please report in on the good the bad and the ugly of streaming TV services.
Yep. Hulu has a DVR function. Doesn't store it on your device, but allows you to go back and watch it later. You can also rewind live games or pause them, but it does make you watch the commercials (only when fast forwarding through the portion you haven't watched yet). There is another tier of pricing that allows you to bypass that I believe.If you can't watch the game live, can you record it or somehow watch it later?
If you can't watch the game live, can you record it or somehow watch it later?
100% satisfied with Hulu live.
I would never, ever go back to dish or cable. Especially since it’s $40 a month with no tax or bullshit nickel and dime fees. Straight up $39.99 auto debited.
Instead of having to use the ESPN app on my Roku to find out of market games, the Hulu channel guide just adds ten or twelve different ESPN "channels" to the guide and you select which one you want to watch. For example, if you were, say, an SMU fan and your game wasn't on in your market, you'd normally have to switch to the ESPN app to watch it. Hulu Live avoids that by just listing all the games available, which is a shit ton. When football is over for the day it goes back to just listing the main ESPN, ESPNU, ESPN2, and ESPN News channels.
Same thing with BTN and Fox channels. If Penn State is playing on your normal BTN channel but the Hawks are the alternate, it lists them both so you don't have to switch over to the BTN app.
Able to watch all games on my phone on one app, don’t need all the network-specific apps. Can also DVR from my phone in case I’m out of the house and forget.
Has the SEC Network which, I don’t care what anyone says, has the best non-game shows about their sports, period. It also adds another option for games that you can’t normally see if you’re interested in them.
Also get all the local Sioux City and Sioux Falls channels.
Last but not least, and the most important thing for me, it supports 60 fps. Anyone who has ever watched any kind of sports at 30 fps knows exactly what I mean. It's completely unwatchable. Hulu live's channels are all 60 fps for sports.
Of course Dish and DTV does a lot of this stuff, but it’s sure as hell not $40 a month, free of contract, free of equipment, and free of equipment fees. My internet also doesn't go wonky or go out altogether during bad weather.
For disclosure, I have 75M down and 3M up. If your internet is on the slow side or gets unreliable at times, ymmv. Hulu live includes 2 devices at a time; my son and I can both watch HD, 60fps broadcasts at the same time without a hiccup at 75M down and my WiFi manager shows that while doing that, we’re only using 20-25M.
Huge clarification needed that most people don't know about; all Fox, ESPN, ABC, BTN, SEC, etc. channels broadcast in 720p. You can't get them in 1080, and there are no network broadcasts in the US at 1080p currently. 1080p is all PPV and on-demand video. Some channels do broadcast in 1080i.Are you getting 1080p at 60 FPS or just 720?
One thing I can't stand about streaming services...and granted this is pretty minor...is that they are considerably behind the cable/satellite providers. I have DTV and my buddy has DTV Now, and his sports streams are a good 3-5 minutes behind mine. So he gets pissed when I text him about things that just happened because they haven't happened for him yet. He also has to stay off twitter and forums because people watching on cable/satellite are ahead of him and will spoil things.
Huge clarification needed that most people don't know about; all Fox, ESPN, ABC, BTN, SEC, etc. channels broadcast in 720p. You can't get them in 1080, and there are no network broadcasts in the US at 1080p currently. 1080p is all PPV and on-demand video. Some channels do broadcast in 1080i.
But we do get full available resolution at 60fps on both TVs at once. My kid and I both had the Saints game on last night at 720/60fps (highest available). No hiccups at all. If you switch channels it takes less than a couple seconds to go full resolution. For channels that do go 1080i / 60fps, we get that also.
When I had Playstation Vue I had way fewer channels in 60fps, but to be fair that may have changed this year. I don't know.
THIS.LISTEN PEOPLE, there is no damn reason this day in age to have cable or satellite.
They have an unlimited screens option for $15/month.Too funny...I just had this conversation last night with my wife...I'm switching to Hulu Live. How about three people who want to watch at once...is there a solve for that?
THIS.
Quit wasting your money if you have reliable internet.
Actually, I think it's migrated out of the wild west phase. You do have several provider options, but you have the same thing or more with cable providers.I still think the streaming stuff needs a few years to figure things out and even consolidate a little bit. Right now there's just way too many options, to many apps, too many issues (DVR, guides, channel disputes, etc). Streaming tv is definitely the future, but seems we're still a bit in the wild west phase.
Actually, I think it's migrated out of the wild west phase. You do have several provider options, but you have the same thing or more with cable providers.
What I love about it is the price competitiveness that you don't have with cable and Dish. Until now they had you by the short hairs and could charge literally whatever they want. Need more money? Add some fees. Still need more money? Add even more fees.
With streaming everyone is in the same boat with roughly the same channels and features, so they have to charge what the market will bear. Which is about $0 a month. Not $150+.
What has always differentiated (until now) is 1) local channels which has been solved, and 2) internet speed. That one is getting better and better every day. I know that 5 years ago, 5MB down was the fastest you could get in my area period. In that time frame my speed has gone from 5 to 10, to 12, to 20, to 50, to now I'm at 75. all for roughly the same price because my internet company has been upgrading their equipment.
I do know that my uncle who lives in Minnesota can't watch Vikings games in his town on Cable or Dish (without Sunday ticket), and I'm 20 miles from the border and I can watch them no prob on Hulu streaming.
LISTEN PEOPLE, there is no damn reason this day in age to have cable or satellite.
Most Extreme Elimination Challenge spawning from Takeshi's Castle is the only thing associated with Japnese TV worth a damn. Kenny Blankenship, Captain Teneal, and Guy Le Douche are GOATs.No streaming service has TVJapan and if Ma can't watch her daily NHK drama and my boy loses Anpanman, they'll murder me. I have suggested that we run sling off of her parents' satellite receiver in Japan and one of our friends here actually does that, but I have been vetoed.
Its definitely something I keep a close eye on. My internet recently got upgraded to 100MB without my price going up, so internet speeds are just blowing up right now.
This can vary widely depending on where you live. I had a 250 MB package with blast or burst or whatever Comcast sold when I lived in Evanston. With the population density and everyone on streaming from 7 to 11 PM, my speeds would routinely fall to 10 mbps or less. It would run 200+ during the day or at like 2 in the morning, but when everyone was streaming, it was garbage. It was actually so bad that I had to have a DSL backup line installed because my job changed to a virtual desktop and I couldn't even maintain constant connectivity.
Now I'm out in the country and have AT&T fiber and that thing runs north of 75 at all times. I think the cable companies are having huge issues in the cities. And the problem was twofold. One, the wired connection would slow to a crawl and two, with 100 units in my building, you couldn't find a wi-fi channel that wouldn't be bogged down with data.
Are you getting 1080p at 60 FPS or just 720?
One thing I can't stand about streaming services...and granted this is pretty minor...is that they are considerably behind the cable/satellite providers. I have DTV and my buddy has DTV Now, and his sports streams are a good 3-5 minutes behind mine. So he gets pissed when I text him about things that just happened because they haven't happened for him yet. He also has to stay off twitter and forums because people watching on cable/satellite are ahead of him and will spoil things.
I still think the streaming stuff needs a few years to figure things out and even consolidate a little bit. Right now there's just way too many options, to many apps, too many dongles (firestick, roku, chromecast, etc) too many issues (DVR, guides, channel disputes, etc). Streaming tv is definitely the future, but seems we're still a bit in the wild west phase.